![]() |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Atul, Back a whole bunch of turns ago you were repeatedly attacking me with single commanders. Now you are attacking an empty province with a single commander again. I assume there has to be a reason for it, but I can't for the life of me figure out what its gaining you.
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Quote:
All of us involved have put a great deal of thought and preparation into every game in the series (if you know me, you know I wouldn't have it any other way), including almost a month for this last one before we even got started. While I can't speak for all the noobs, this game has certainly added to the knowledge I picked up from the vets in the previous two games. Hopefully, the focus on learning and spirit of teamwork will continue for as long as feasible in this game and in any future iterations. Game note: With luck we should be able to get one more turn in before having to institute a delay, unless the vets have found a suitable sub for atul. |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Quote:
Previously, those scouting attacks were just in case you'd bring in a new army, so I'd know your composition in advance before you would be attacking me. |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Tell Machaka to break siege before his guys all die from disease. This particular fort is really easy to starve, as I discovered earlier.
I think Lingchih is subbing for Atul. Not 100% sure. |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Machaka staled last turn. Once again proving that the noobs are not immune to staling.
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Quote:
Ahh, Guess I'm lucky, never having had that bug happen to me. And I suppose the other makes sense. it just confused me that you were sitting on my unprotected border sending one commander at a time at it, when you had an army that could have easily taken the province. |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
The troops get dropped at the end of the host so if you pay attention you can see that they don't have a leader. But guess I wasn't paying attention.
As to Ulm being unable to stop my closest army, guess that was a bit of a boast. But, I still consider me handing out 4 times the casualties I got when my troops were outnumbered 3 to 1 a pretty decisive show of who's in the receiving end. Is Ling subbing for me? I'd think the current turn would be the last one I have time for. |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
I think maybe atul should talk to ling sometime ;) otherwise I'd just assume we're on delay...
really theres only two players left on the noob team I dunno if theres any reason not to wait for him... |
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
atul's first point was a joke. Scouting is the correct answer.
|
Re: Noobs vs. Vets III: Revolution, MA, CBM. Let's get it on!
Actually, wouldn't be that sure. Most units droppings to date have been playing Marverni, check some strat thread about them and see people complaining about the behaviour.
Scouting is a real answer but it doesn't explain those troops dropping away. Oh, and about that troop concentration earlier on, they were supposed to go to Jotun front but someone Arrowed the Van that was supposed to sail them over. They were never intended to go at Arco lands. And as to Ling, the last thing I heard was him saying he'd rather not but can if no other solution presents itself. I'm not that sure I want to burden him if that's how he feels. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.