Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
 

ok - how long are we going to play tonight?

Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
 

seems the server crashed, guess thats my queue, I got work in 6 hours.

If the rest of you really want to continue you can set me to ai or let me stale up to 4 turns.

Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
 

its ok Methel - lest make a turn or two and lets finish it for today,. It's 1am here...

Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
 

thats it for me guys, good night http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif

Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
 

Open letter to Jazzepi, god of T'ien Ch'i:
Greetings my friend,
I beg your pardon, but it seems that the massages on the forum are not red or understood by you, so I took the freedom to communicate with you thought this, rather formal way.
My concern is that you took too provinces that are very close to my capital. There is only 1 province separating them from my capital. Since we have a non agression pact I can't attack you, but your acts are somewhat hostile, as if you would only wait for the end of the before mentioned pact to invade my heartland. If we can't reach to some kind of mutually beneficial solution I'm terribly afraid that I need to cancel our pact, and this would somewhat affect our peaceful relations. I don't wish to mention the horrific possibility of a full scale war.
Thanks a lot for your kind understanding,
Your friend,
DreamSlayer, God of Man

Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
 

Well, I understand that if you have choosen this kind of "communication channel" you expect that others will say something. In my opinion, which can be wrong of course, advancing and taking INDEPENDENT provinces is not a hostile action. No matter where those INDEPENDENT provinces are located. Unless of course, your pact was saying something about those INDEPENDENT provinces. Of course you may dislike his movments, but as far as I understand the situation, he makes everything according to the rules.

Also, as far as we used to play, Nations with NAPs CAN fight with each other, but ONly on the INDEPENDET's lands... Saying simply - atack those INDEPENDENT provinces also - there can be only one:)

Look - with Pangea, Arco has a very clear situation - we have war http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif

ONE MORE THING TO THOSE WHO DONT READ EMAILS:

SERVER HAS BEEN RELOCATED, SO PLEASE, MAKE YOUR MOVES ONCE AGAIN FOR THIS TURN!!!!

Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
 

*Out of Character*

I'm fairly sure you aren't allowed to cancel pacts for any reason, WSzaboPeter. Besides of course the other person violating it in same way. The NAP we setup didn't stipulate anything about invading neutral territories close to your capital.

You may be unhappy with Tein'chi's expansion, but that's part of the problem with making pacts! I made one with the lizard race in my newbie PBEM game and he's basically over-running the world right now. Even 3vs1 we might still lose.

Jazzepi

Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
 

Kojusoki, that's wise. I will attack and take only those 2 offending territories and then if T'ien Ch'i wishes peace I will grant him peace.

Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
 

If they ARE INDEPENDENT - sure.
If something is not "not-allowed", it means that it is allowed.

Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
 

Hmm, I think the diplomacy rules are a bit constraining, how about we use sheps rules of diplomacy instead, makes for a more interesting game imho.

Also I would considert taking a province bordering my capital a hostile move, about as hostile as when you attacked me koju http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif