![]() |
Re: APC Development and related topics.
Here's what I've got at the moment :
"Oct 21, 2010 To date, Bell is on contract to deliver 70 Yankees and 28 Zulus; 31 UH-1Y and 11 AH-1Zs have been delivered. Two of each type were used for developmental testing and will be retained as test assets. Full-rate production began on the Yankee last year. The Zulu has been cleared to use all Hellfire missile variants, 2.75-in. rockets, the 20-mm. gun and AIM-9 anti-aircraft missile series." |
Re: APC Development and related topics.
Poland to update ROSOMAK (PATRIA AMV) with new recon sensor gear by the end of this year.
http://defense-update.com/wp/2010122...e-rosomak.html Regards, Pat |
Re: APC Development and related topics.
U.S. SECDEF Gates kills the EFV. I'm not adding it as a "deletion" to my last patch input yet. Gates also wants to kill the F-35 program as well to meet the goal of cutting the U.S. defense budget by 80 to 100 billion dollars between 2012 - 2016. The F-35 cut issue is meeting with resistance to Gates from the new congress. So congress might step into the fray to save the EFV as well. Only time will tell but as with real life vs game life one thing is certain for now, both will still be around after the next patch unless something drastic happens in real life.
http://www.defpro.com/news/details/21003/ Regards, Pat |
Re: APC Development and related topics.
Quote:
However budgetary realities being what they are, something will give in at some point... |
Re: APC Development and related topics.
Some were surprised by Gen. Amos being made Commandant of the CORPS for his support of the EFV as SECDEF Gates has been against it for some time now, but I have read all I need to now put the EFV on my delete list for the next patch now as well. SLAMRAM will be on the list as well though I noted no mention of MEADS. Some might find it interesting to see the direction the SECDEF and USAF want to take outside the F-35 program. There have been rumors for some time that the B-1B and B-2 would not be the end of strategic bomber development for us, it appears it's going to happen sooner then later now as well. Please read and enjoy the breakdown of the U.S. Defence spending overhaul over the next five years. Again note from this ref the source is located in the upper right corner to the article.
http://www.defpro.com/daily/details/...5f3882e1791d50 Also a well respected "think tanks" response. http://www.defpro.com/news/details/21043/ And to get back on topic this could be the end of the GVC program just recently revived last month for new bids - hope you like the BRADLEY. Regards, Pat |
Re: APC Development and related topics.
Well this is why I use the sources I do. This will effectively end my discussion on the EFV unless a miracle comes to Detroit (And those folks could use the jobs lost.) and the CORPS. This is a very comprehensive article on the EFV program from beginning to end and for and against it. A very good read.
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...updated-02302/ Here's to another open slot! Regards, Pat |
Re: APC Development and related topics.
Personally I always thought the EFV was an over ambitions "magic bullet" program.
The USMC IS in desperate need of a replacement for the AAV (first fielded in 1972) and hopefully some the research done for the EFV will be used to develop a cost effective and "reasonable" replacement. |
Re: APC Development and related topics.
Quote:
We are talking about ex US servicemen, armed with american weapons and used for convoy/facility protection duties, VIP details and similar tasks. It makes some sense to have them in the US OOB as armament/training/morale is compatible with the US OOB, they and US troops have occasionally fought side by side and last but not least they have been employed in sizable numbers. That said they are obviously a "flavor" unit, not inherently more valuable than an additional F-4 with a different loadout or whatever; they could be easily shifted to the green OOB with some tweaking. |
Re: APC Development and related topics.
The ARE meant to represent Contractors like Blackwater but they have been moved
Don |
Re: APC Development and related topics.
The GCV program kinda like the EFV program kinda like the...well that one is in the JET...thread. Even my heads starting to spin a little and I'm not even possessed though some might question that!?! It's getting serious though if you're outside the country you might not fully understand the situation here caused by the last election, this was clearly shown after the State of the Union address by the President when normally each political party (Republicans & Democrats) has an opportunity to express their support or rebuttal to the Presidents speech. This year we also for the first time had a third response from the "Tea Party" backed Republicans, which support defense but are more fiscally conservative. I'm not expressing any political view here as this is fact based, however it's having it's ripple effect on defense issues as these will show.
The GCV program is meant to take us to the next gen IFV etc. beyond the BRADLEY, however as I brought to your attention it was cancelled (Budget etc.) in the early summer of 2010. It has since been resurrected with tighter guidelines in cost management and design features or has it? Is it really needed? http://www.defpro.com/news/details/21503/ The new GVC development teams. http://www.defpro.com/news/details/21423/ http://www.defpro.com/news/details/21399/ More on the...EFV :shock: All DoD components unified on the budget. http://www.defpro.com/news/details/21567/ Is the DoD concept of Amphibious Warfare wrong? http://www.defpro.com/news/details/21460/ Yes our old friend exceeds expectations or a line from a favorite comedy movie from across the pond "I'm not dead yet!" http://www.defpro.com/news/details/21482/ Everyone have a great weekend! Regards, Pat |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.