![]() |
Re: Nations under CBM 1.6
Quote:
|
Re: Nations under CBM 1.6
Mardagg, your strategy is ok for SP. For MP its problematic. No strong astral is bad in late game. No access to water hurts too. If you make it to late game you'd be left with a bless that is only good for a capital only now easy to counter average MR unit.
Where I fighting your build I'd have MHed all your mages and enslaved/soul slayed your armies. I'd have shut down your capital production as my first shot in the war. Astral pretty much rules end game and your bless has denied you any piece of that cake. I'd say Machaka needs either awake SC or awake/sleeping rainbow (with s6,d5, w3 for example) |
Re: Nations under CBM 1.6
Shouldn't the hunter spider have str 18?
|
Re: Nations under CBM 1.6
[quote=vfb;725054]
Quote:
You want to show me how useful spiders are now in later battles vs humans? MR 10,MR 11,hell even MR14 with S9 blessing are a joke for an Sc type expensive unit. They are for Early game mainly and to a lesser extend for midgame. I dont need any MR there,i dont need any S9 there. S9 makes the hunters much worse in comparison to E9 vs indies and early game humans. U cant rely on spiders wihtout riders alone for that matter. IF u would take S9N9,we could talk again.But that really doesnt allow for good scales anymore and still leaves u with a v fragile rider and a durable but weak offensive spider. And why do you even talk about late game,when i always stated that i concentrate on early game with that blessing?? |
Re: Nations under CBM 1.6
Quote:
|
Re: Nations under CBM 1.6
Quote:
Basically i am saying,that a much better early game makes up for that on many maps. I still got Nature and Death for Tartarians,Astral summons/rituals are a lot less common without clams. I rely on spiders early to mid,to ideally get number 1 or 2 in provinces. Then i support them with dragon mastered sorcerers summoining 3 fire drakes per turn and mages. Late game tartarians with GoH up,due to my early power i should have v high gem income. And,btw u cant shut down my capital January Year2. Later on i dont rely on spiders much anymore at all,but i still will have like 50+ hunters left,because they simply never ever die vs indies. What u are mixing up is my game plan with the general game plan,advisable for standard builds. i mean common,after all the developers even thought that 120g hunters are balanced.I even took that build for fun purposes at that time and wasnt that disappointed at all.Now you basically get a free spider every 3 u produce.Also u get nice gold income since ur upkeep stays pretty low with those low number sacred units. we got 33% decrease in cost now,mind you,thats HUUGE! Maybe even overpowered,seriously. |
Re: Nations under CBM 1.6
The problem is not the price on hunters. It's lack of synergy.
Your plan sounds ok. I'd even give it a try in a few SP test games. The thing is that no matter how you turn it Machaka still remains a weak nation IMO. I think their mages should be boosted or they should get some unique (sacred --> for bless) summons. |
Re: Nations under CBM 1.6
Mardagg, it might be a good idea to test your Machaka in MP. From the way it looks to me, it would be very apparent to any human player you rely heavily on capital only sacreds. The AI is not capable of doing the remote attacks, but you can be guaranteed humans will use things like Rain of Toads, Hurricane, Locust Swarms, Blight, Baleful Star on your capital; expect the raiders to land in your capital to wreak even more havoc (Machaka PD sucks donkey balls, so even half-witted raiders will rout the PD). Worse, your mages in the capital will be mindhunted if it is apparent you have zero astral mages there (there will be an Astral projection cast on your capital, and if it succeeds, next turn lots machakan brains will fry).
Those are not late-game strategies, they are the midgame ones; of course you can rely on luck and hope you find a site with astral shamans/amazons, but that would be quite a gamble. Besides, having somebody who can forge Crystal shield and crystal matrixes would be quite a big boon (with the chronical need for firegems Machaka has, one should not forget the possibility of Power of the Spheres and the artifical communions, which save firegems for more urgent needs). |
Re: Nations under CBM 1.6
Quote:
I believe this is what makes Machaka strong now. U believe its the mages. I dont agree there since u are lacking Astral and Blood. U want to cut on the weaknesses ,I want to emphazize on the strengths. Both are valid approaches in general. boosting their mages will not happen,QM said that.Its not thematic and they are good enough considering they got the spider form for quite a big survivabilty in huge battles. What i would like to see is making the assassin non cap only. But that probably not thematic,too. Increase the PD at least. I believe Machaka to be pretty good now,if are able to include the 33% decrease in cost for the sacred in your strat somehow. |
Re: Nations under CBM 1.6
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.