![]() |
Re: AI Campaign => For a Challenging AI opponent
Quote:
What is even cooler is that you don’t have to refill it with supplies it automatically resupplies itself each month with its own replenishment fleet http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon6.gif JLS |
Re: AI Campaign => For a Challenging AI opponent
Or it can be useful in an enemy system, as it is faster to put into action than a planet with a supply base. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif
Oleg, yes it can be a nightmare if you do want to prevent any waste. But why not forgetting about this waste? I won't even mention what will happen when you have ten systems for instance, and other "toys". I am myself in love with this option, but I am a lazy player when it comes to micromanagement. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif And even expansion in other systems is so much easier with this option, as you can colonize these worlds much faster than with Starlines, although you could also use both options. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif |
Re: AI Campaign => For a Challenging AI opponent
I don’t see what the big deal is Oleg, I look it as auto starliners that fill your planets so you don’t have to. This make for less micromanagement.
I don’t see how you are loosing slaves when you are gaining one per turn in all the Planets and if the Home World stays full as it usually does with v3.02 with the Organic Gestation Vats and the Replicant Center. Hmmm same effect actually. I noticed in v4.0 with the immigration Option the Organic Replicant centers produce more per turn then v3.02 |
Re: AI Campaign => For a Challenging AI opponent
Quote:
|
Re: AI Campaign => For a Challenging AI opponent
Sorry GLV, what I meant is that, when colonizing other systems (or even major planets in your system), you could still use a lot of Starliners to speed up the process along with option 1. In minor systems, I tend to send only few or even none at all Starliners, if I am patient enough. Especially now that I am having an early war which is an heavy strain on my economy. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif
|
Re: AI Campaign => For a Challenging AI opponent
Certainly, HumanTech I idea is to help the casual players to stand up aginst AIs on steroids. Still, after my first experience i would never ever pick up this option again - obviously. I'm a micro nut and it is way too easy to dominate AI with so many extra people. I would really like to see an option for 2M cargo small starliners to reduce ship numbers.
|
Re: AI Campaign => For a Challenging AI opponent
Yes, GLV, if one assume HP-I option is a representation of hidden starliners to help micro-man., there is no problem. But my heart bleeds when I see a full planet with no room for new "subjects". Involuntarely I want to releave the crisis and plunge into the more micro-man. than ever before !
|
Re: AI Campaign => For a Challenging AI opponent
I am also with you Oleg, I prefer the Star Liner system as well. However, Option (O1*) is a fair compromise for those that want a more robust and less micromanaged game http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif
|
Re: AI Campaign => For a Challenging AI opponent
Quote:
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif GLV <-> Oleg http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif Ok ok the Planet Lore is BACK http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif Yes GLV, to complement the reduction in SM tech the cost for the Open Warp and the Create Planet Components also will be reduced http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif [ October 25, 2003, 16:45: Message edited by: JLS ] |
Re: AI Campaign => For a Challenging AI opponent
Originally posted by QBrigid:
Quote:
However if you feel that L20 is not low enough, QB please go to the AIC extras folders and double click on the AIC default LOW Event Frequency and install this as you did the original AIC v4.0.Zip. I had you in mind with this file; the result will be the same events but at L10 percentage low chance frequency that you preferred in a much earlier post http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif - - - Quote:
For example, Ship and Unit data Espionage etc. that is useless for the AI - - - Quote:
Alas, no. I will have FQM add-on ready for v4.02. In addition I would like Fyron to get a look the end result, before the release. Only a few updates left in me and that is it, I plan on having someone else maintain AIC. - - - Quote:
Maintain 13 races in the primary folder in your Solo games and one additional per multiplayer http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif [ October 25, 2003, 18:17: Message edited by: JLS ] |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.