Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
 

Any one care to venture a game for the title of Best Game of 2003?

Any one care to venture a game for the title of Worst Game of 2003?

My votes:

BG 2003 = SimCity 4 Rush Hour
WG 2003 = Moo3

Runner ups:

BG - GalCiv
WG - SimCity 4

Honorable Mentions:

Good Games of 2003
Elite Force II
Rise of Nations
Knights of the Old Republic
Star Fury

Bad Games of 2003
Unreal II

[ January 08, 2004, 18:14: Message edited by: Atrocities ]

Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
 

Ok, I'll play..

BG 2003: Call of Duty
WG 2003: Moo3

Only new game I have installed in 2003: Starfury (and even then it's the beta build.)

I know it's sad, but time and budget shortages have crippled my gamming purchases.

Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
 

Call of Duty is a darn good game. Thanks for mentioning it David. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
 

Hmm... do expansions count? http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif

Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
 

Sure they do.

Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
 

I think Neverwinter Nights: Hordes of the Underdark came out recently, so that would get my vote for best game of 03.

Worst game is tied for that Civ 3 expansion (because it is part of Civ 3) and MOO3.

Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Ouch. At least Civ III ws playable.

[edit: 2 != 3]

[ January 08, 2004, 20:28: Message edited by: Loser ]

Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
 

Best Game Empire Deluxe Internet Editon

I don't have a worst game because I have only played SEIV and EDIE.

Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
 

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Ouch. At least Civ III ws playable.

[edit: 2 != 3] </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">So? There are a lot of horrid games that are "playable." And besides, part of the problem with Civ 3 is the evil marketing BS they pulled with it, splitting the game into 3 parts so they could milk more money without adding ANY meaningful features in any of the expansions. Civ 3 + 2 expansions at their best almost equal Civ 2 Gold at its worst, save some really stupid things like removing the hit point/firepower system of Civ 2 that helped tremendously over Civ 1. No comparison at all to Civ 2 ToT.

Re: Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad
 

If expansions/mods count, then... Drum-drum-drum... !

The best 2003 game is the AIC mod for SEIV. At least it is the only game I played the whole year http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif