![]() |
AI opponents lack of researching
I have played lots of games(single&multiplayer) and have noticed the AI opponents have a serious problem setting units aside for researching. In the beginning of the game the AI opponents do a good job researching... yet by middle and late game their researching never seems to increase causing them to be feeble in magic.
Hopefully something can be done in a future patch to help the researching for AI opponents . |
Re: AI opponents lack of researching
Hmm, I've not really seen this myself. Sure there are some nations that suck, but there's usually a few that are going nuts with the research. Then again I'm playing largish maps with 10+ opponents, maybe your sample is skewed if you play fewer opponents or smaller maps. High level magic probably isn't worth as much on a smaller map anyway, since the time to get to it (and have the gem economy to use it) might be too long.
Its somewhat dependant on how you like to research as well, if you are a gung ho researcher you should notice that the other nations are lacking there (but its reletive http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif ). If you are playing Ulm (usually...) then you should notice that you arn't in front, or even in the middle. |
Re: AI opponents lack of researching
Quote:
|
Re: AI opponents lack of researching
Quote:
|
Re: AI opponents lack of researching
AIs always beat me in the research race unless I become very rich fast and find a library on turn 2...
Where they really fall behind is site-searching and summoning. [ January 26, 2004, 18:37: Message edited by: Saber Cherry ] |
Re: AI opponents lack of researching
Quote:
|
Re: AI opponents lack of researching
Quote:
Edit: Oh - I just read the first post. My experience is mainly with the early game. Maybe by late game (by which you mean what turn?) they should pick it up - I wouldn't necessarily be a good judge. They seem to site search fairly well to me - often quickly, but not always very deeply, which is kinda interesting for SP because then you still are tempted to search their territory for more toys. It does seem like maybe they could do more summoning. I saw Tien'Chi do what seemed like a healthy amount of summoning - steamrollered my Arco with a bunch of Celestial giants or something - game over. PvK [ January 26, 2004, 20:09: Message edited by: PvK ] |
Re: AI opponents lack of researching
Quote:
|
Re: AI opponents lack of researching
I usually play Machaka on huge maps... maybe that's why I have such a great lead over the computer opponents, since they have the witches that give 5 research for 90 gold.
I thought I would bring up the topic because when I place 10 computer opponents on Impossible AI... one of them should be able to take the lead on research... at least once in awhile. |
Re: AI opponents lack of researching
Quote:
I'm not saying Ulm doesn't benefit from research, nor that Ulm (standard theme) can't research well without an early library. What I was saying was that Ulm (in particular from my experiences) doesn't research heavilly early, sure they may shoot for one of the above mentioned areas, but compared to Pythium (again in my experience) they lag in research. Anyway, Machaka can research pretty quickly so maybe that's where you percieve the lag, though if the AIs are pulling off decently high level spells whats to complain about? There's also the difference in getting to lvls 4/5 in everything and getting to lvls2/3 in a few and lvl7+ in one area. Diffrent strokes for diffrnet folks http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.