![]() |
Smiting Season (newb-intermediate, LA, CBM 1.92) smiting has begun!
1 Attachment(s)
Looking for players with some MP experience. Doesn't have to be a lot, but this shouldn't be your first or second MP game.
settings: Map: Realm of Roaring Rhinos Players: 12 Mods: CBM 1.92 Era: late age Indie strength: 7 Magic sites: 45 Hall of fame: 15 score graphs: off all other settings default banned nations: Ermor, R'lyeh hosting: Llamaserver 30h turns until at least turn 30, will advance to 48h afterwards as needed diplomacy is non-binding, gem/item/province trading remains inviolate Please do not abandon the game or stale repeatedly without notifying me or posting- I'd much rather find a sub than have someone quit abruptly. 1) Groundworm- Marignon 2) Immaculate- Patala 3) Slobby- Gath 4) Carpetbagger- Pythium 5) Bat/man- Bogarus 6) Finalgenesis- Atlantis 7) decourcy- T'ien Ch'i 8) Snacktime- Utgard 9) shard- Jomon 10) Nightfall- Ulm 11) HoleyDooley- Agartha 12) schoelle- Man 13) Whollaborg- Arcoscephale |
Re: Smiting Season (newb-intermediate, LA, CBM 1.92) recruiting
I'd like to join playing Acrosephale.
|
Re: Smiting Season (newb-intermediate, LA, CBM 1.92) recruiting
You've been around for awhile, but I've never played with you. Are you new to MP? Vet? Somewhere in-between?
|
Re: Smiting Season (newb-intermediate, LA, CBM 1.92) recruiting
I have played few multiplayer games thou not recently, quite sporadically i'd say. I even managed to win one or two ;)
|
Re: Smiting Season (newb-intermediate, LA, CBM 1.92) recruiting
Patala.
Interesting that diplomacy is binding. Thats an increasingly unpopular option. Should be interesting how it changes the dynamic. |
Re: Smiting Season (newb-intermediate, LA, CBM 1.92) recruiting
Welcome aboard. Immaculate, why is binding diplomacy becoming unpopular? Would you suggest less rigorous diplomacy?
Non-binding diplomacy certainly has it's place in the game, but I don't know if I'm a fan of securing a NAP with someone and not actually knowing if I have a NAP with them. |
Re: Smiting Season (newb-intermediate, LA, CBM 1.92) recruiting
no- its fine- i am okay with either option. i guess i just played in a lot of more cut-throat games.
|
Re: Smiting Season (newb-intermediate, LA, CBM 1.92) recruiting
I am having a bit of second though on binding diplomacy. How is it enforced in not so rare cases of conflicting treaties the inevitable wars and such would bring?
|
Re: Smiting Season (newb-intermediate, LA, CBM 1.92) recruiting
Quote:
In general, people only really sign NAPs. Alliances, if any, are always temporary (and never written or binding in any way). You rarely see anything that may be considered, say, a mutual defense pact or somesuch (i.e. X attacks Y, Ys treaty with Z forces them to attack X), because there is only one winner at the end. I suppose someone can try more zany treaty ideas (and go for things like a double victory), but in the overwhelming majority of cases, you don't see it. And things like gem/item trades are basically always honored, even in games where diplomacy isn't binding. Even in non-binding diplo games, the majority of treaties which are signed are generally maintained (due to the reputation cost of breaking them). |
Re: Smiting Season (newb-intermediate, LA, CBM 1.92) recruiting
gath please
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.