.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Space Empires: IV & V (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Black Holes ain't so black... (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=12523)

Slick July 21st, 2004 10:07 PM

Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/0....ap/index.html

Slick.

Renegade 13 July 22nd, 2004 04:50 AM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Very interesting stuff. I don't quite understand though; the universe has been around for billions of years, I would think that some of the original black holes would have "deteriorated" and spit the matter back out into the universe in its new "mangled" form by now. How come we haven't detected such a massive ejection of matter into space by now? Maybe we just haven't been looking for it, or are not capable of detecting it just yet?

Slick July 22nd, 2004 05:00 AM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
I don't know the details of his newest theory, but in "A Brief History of Time", he mentions that black holes can "evaporate". This happens when a pair of "virtual" particles (one particle and one anti-particle) are created just outside the event horizon. Some of the time, only the anti-particle falls into the black hole. This then annihilates some of the matter in the black hole, thus reducing its mass, while the particle from the other half of the pair escapes and can be seen as "radiation" from the black hole. Obviously this theory has been modified or maybe even replaced by his newer one. I hope Hawking writes another book before he dies.

Slick.

Aiken July 22nd, 2004 07:24 AM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
hehe, RIP Wormholes.

Karibu July 22nd, 2004 09:14 AM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Renegade 13:
Very interesting stuff. I don't quite understand though; the universe has been around for billions of years, I would think that some of the original black holes would have "deteriorated" and spit the matter back out into the universe in its new "mangled" form by now. How come we haven't detected such a massive ejection of matter into space by now? Maybe we just haven't been looking for it, or are not capable of detecting it just yet?
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">The life time of black holes is billions of times as long as our universe is old by now. To make it more understandable, our universe is about 10^10 years old (10 billion years. I know it is about 5 billion years, but I speak of cosmological decades, not exact years, so 10^10 years is fitting).

In year 10^40 there are nothing but black holes and neutron stars left in our universe. Most black holes have been evaporated by year 10^67. Most massive black holes live as old as 100^100 years. After that there is nothing but radiation left. If you are interested to know more, I suggest you find a book The Five Ages of the Universe - Inside the Physics of Eternity by Fred Adams & Greg Laughling. Very captivating book.

Renegade 13 July 22nd, 2004 04:12 PM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Karibu:
The life time of black holes is billions of times as long as our universe is old by now. To make it more understandable, our universe is about 10^10 years old (10 billion years. I know it is about 5 billion years, but I speak of cosmological decades, not exact years, so 10^10 years is fitting).
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I thought cosmologists had narrowed the age of the universe down to somewhere between 14 and 15 billion years old. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/confused.gif But perhaps I'm mistaken.

Slick July 22nd, 2004 04:30 PM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Actually, the rate at which a black hole evaporates (under Hawking's theory) is related to its mass. The larger the black hole, the slower it evaporates. More accurately, it's related to the surface area of the event horizon (proportional to mass squared or possibly cubed, I don't have the formula in front of me).

Also, there are theories that allow for the creation of black holes by mechanisms other than stellar collapse. These other mechanisms could produce black holes of quite small mass which would have very short lifetimes relative to the age of the universe.

Slick.

[ July 22, 2004, 15:34: Message edited by: Slick ]

spoon July 22nd, 2004 04:54 PM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Slick:
Also, there are theories that allow for the creation of black holes by mechanisms other than stellar collapse.
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">...such as when PBW goes down...

Suicide Junkie July 22nd, 2004 07:23 PM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Slick:
Also, there are theories that allow for the creation of black holes by mechanisms other than stellar collapse. These other mechanisms could produce black holes of quite small mass which would have very short lifetimes relative to the age of the universe.

Slick.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">There are also potentially "primordial black holes" which would have been generated about the time of the big bang at a variety of sizes...
As such, they'd evaporate at various times, and might be visible from the burst of radiation as they die.
Too close, and they'd irradiate the solar system killing everything, of course, so there is an upper limit as to how many could be floating around.

Slick July 22nd, 2004 08:32 PM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Yes, that is one of the other mechanisms for creation of black holes. Not to scare anyone, but gamma ray observing satellites "see" about 1 huge gamma ray burst per day from varying, but so far safe, distances. The question of what causes these is debated. One postulated source is the "death" of a black hole. If one occurred close to our solar system, we would be fried.

Slick.

narf poit chez BOOM July 24th, 2004 06:10 AM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
2 million years from now: 'Billy! Stop poking that black hole with a stick! We need that one!' http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

LonghornXtreme July 27th, 2004 03:47 AM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Isn't the only reason that black holes aren't truly black is that at the event horizon, particles are being ripped in two, with one entering the black hole and one being emitted as light? Thats why black holes aren't black?

Don't quote me, I don't know too much about the universe.

Slick July 27th, 2004 04:22 AM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Nothing special happens as something passes thru the event horizon - it's simply the point of no return to "outside" the black hole. If you were in a ship, you couldn't see any barrier nor would you feel any different as you passed through. Your fate would be sealed (though you might not know it yet) as you would soon be ripped to shreads as you got closer to the center of the black hole. This has been called in slang "spaghettification" as matter is stretched and pulled apart - those silly astrophysicists! What will eventually kill you (if you aren't bLasted by other incoming matter or radiation) is the point where the force of gravity is significantly higher on one part of your body than another due to being close to the center. This occurs closer to the center than the event horizon and may, for supermassive black holes, take some time to reach.

Slick.

dogscoff July 27th, 2004 02:32 PM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Quote:

the thing about a Black Hole- its main distinguishing feature- is it’s black. And the thing about space, the colour of space, your basic space colour- is its black. So how are you supposed to see them?
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Holly in Red Dwarf, explaining how she managed to fly straight into a cluster of 5 black holes.

Quote:

The thing about grit, right, is that it's black...
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Holly, explaining later on the the 5 black holes were actually 5 bits of grit on the scanner.

Suicide Junkie July 27th, 2004 03:55 PM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Slick:
Nothing special happens as something passes thru the event horizon - it's simply the point of no return to "outside" the black hole. If you were in a ship, you couldn't see any barrier nor would you feel any different as you passed through. Your fate would be sealed (though you might not know it yet) as you would soon be ripped to shreads as you got closer to the center of the black hole. This has been called in slang "spaghettification" as matter is stretched and pulled apart - those silly astrophysicists! What will eventually kill you (if you aren't bLasted by other incoming matter or radiation) is the point where the force of gravity is significantly higher on one part of your body than another due to being close to the center. This occurs closer to the center than the event horizon and may, for supermassive black holes, take some time to reach.

Slick.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Well, for most holes, you'd be spaghettified before you reach the horizon. Neutron stars could do that to you too.
You need the supermassive galactic core type holes in order to reduce the effect to the point where you and your ship can survive at the horizon.

Slick July 27th, 2004 03:57 PM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Agreed. The point was that there is nothing special about crossing the event horizon.

Slick.

Rasorow July 28th, 2004 05:55 PM

Re: Black Holes ain\'t so black...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by narf poit chez BOOM:
2 million years from now: 'Billy! Stop poking that black hole with a stick! We need that one!' http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">LOL

Rasorow


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.