.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Space Empires: IV & V (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=25107)

kalthalior July 26th, 2005 05:22 PM

OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
Shuttle lifts off

Great to see the shuttle back in action.

dogscoff July 27th, 2005 06:31 AM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
Great news about the successful lift off, but:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4719847.stm

What will they do if they find the shuttle is not fit for re-entry? Can they fix it up there, or would they have to use the escape modules on the ISS to get the crew home? Are there anough escape modules to bring them all back down?

Randallw July 27th, 2005 06:37 AM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
I think they have some resin putty to place over any damaged tiles.

dogscoff July 27th, 2005 07:41 AM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
Quote:


I think they have some resin putty to place over any damaged tiles.


And this putty is as good as the asbestos for heat resistance? Why not just make the entire shuttle out of it?

Atrocities July 27th, 2005 09:37 AM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
Its about damn time too!

narf poit chez BOOM July 27th, 2005 07:50 PM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
More expensive?

Suicide Junkie July 27th, 2005 07:57 PM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
Putty is probably not good for structural integrity... it can plug a crack, but a ship made out of it would be like a giant Drushockan booger. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif

narf poit chez BOOM July 27th, 2005 08:23 PM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
Attack of the Giant Space Booger!

geoschmo July 27th, 2005 10:46 PM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
Quote:

dogscoff said:
Quote:


I think they have some resin putty to place over any damaged tiles.


And this putty is as good as the asbestos for heat resistance? Why not just make the entire shuttle out of it?

Probably it's as good for heat resistance on one trip. The tiels are designed to last for several reentries. The Giant Drushokan Space Booger would get the job done once, but it would have to be rebuilt after every flight.

Makes me think of that SNL skit about the "Adobe" car. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif

Captain Kwok July 27th, 2005 10:54 PM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
I just hope it lands safely.

dogscoff July 28th, 2005 06:48 AM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
oh dear... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4723109.stm

Captain Kwok July 28th, 2005 07:41 AM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
That's too bad. But maybe it will help get the next generation of space craft out just a little bit faster...

boran_blok July 28th, 2005 07:36 PM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
Imho there are two solutions for this problem, one might be possible with the current shuttle design but might be impossible due to physics, the second is for the next shuttle design.

First the maybe now possible one: why not install a protective jacket around the heatshield of the shuttle ? it doesnt need it when lifting off, only when coming down.

Second, make it so that in the next shuttle the fuel tanks and booster rockets are on the less vulnerable side, this should be the backside for the current space shuttle, or maybe even the sides.

both solutions however are quite expansive I think so it'll be for the next shuttle.

Baron Munchausen July 29th, 2005 04:50 PM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
Quote:

boran_blok said:
Imho there are two solutions for this problem, one might be possible with the current shuttle design but might be impossible due to physics, the second is for the next shuttle design.

First the maybe now possible one: why not install a protective jacket around the heatshield of the shuttle ? it doesnt need it when lifting off, only when coming down.

Second, make it so that in the next shuttle the fuel tanks and booster rockets are on the less vulnerable side, this should be the backside for the current space shuttle, or maybe even the sides.

both solutions however are quite expansive I think so it'll be for the next shuttle.

For the 'next generation' they should finish the development of the system rather than leave it as a half-baked hack/kludge. You do know that the shuttle was supposed to have a flying 'lifter' to carry it (like the 747 transporter does but more gracefully) to 50,000 feet or so and then launch from there? The current system with the external tank and the boosters is a kludge because they couldn't get the money to complete the original design. That is the real problem. They are using the shuttle in a way it was not intended/designed for.

El_Phil July 29th, 2005 09:13 PM

Re: OT: Space Shuttle returns to flight
 
That assumes they get a budget to do this. Bear in mind this isn't the amount of money they ask for, it's the amount they'll need.

Major engineering projects do not come in on-spec, on time and on budget. Ever. You might get one, maybe, if your lucky and the project isn't ambitious, you'll get two. But never all three.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.