OT: Having fun with pictures
 

One of my friends runs a little market stall, selling various things that she imports from Brazil, and she's asked me to do up a little website for her. Of course, since a considerable bulk of her business is in lingerie, I agreed, provided my payment involved dinner with at least one of the models. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

Anyway, I've got all the pictures for the website, which were sent to me direct from a digital camera, which means they're really big and about 1MB per jpg, which isn't exactly a web-friendly format.

So, I'm wondering if anyone knows of some sort of batch coversion software that can resize the images for me, since going through all 604 manually might actually kill me. Heart strain on this project overall is going to be a worry, actually. And then when I need to make thumbnails, it'll be a tad easier as well.

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

Irfanview has batch conversion available.
Should be quite easy to use it to scale your pictures to whatever size you need.

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

Although it might be a pain to do them individually, Digital cam .jpg images tend to have some serious artifacting. I would take the time to load, remove .jpg 'noise', resize to a common height (maintaining the original proportions) and resave in a no-loss format like .bmp or .png. then do any post production that needs to be done and resave as .jpg with a 1x1x1 sample compression. (Most default .jpg is 2x2x2 sample compression which has a greater amount of artifacting.)

Anyways. Any job worth doing is worth doing well, and gee, hundreds of girls in lingerie that's got to be one tough decision,.. blind batch processing or one at a time to ensure (and aprieciate) the quality of the girls,..(I mean photos) http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

Nuf said, Cheers! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

Of course you could always ask for volunteers to assist you with your project. I'm sure you could find a few helpful types willing to assist you with your heavy burden. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

You know, I had a similiarly sleazy response as DEG and Geo all typed up before there were any responses in this thread http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...ies/stupid.gif, but I said to myself: Nope; I'm not gonna do it. I knew it would happen, though. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...es/biggrin.gif

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

I use Directory Opus ( here ) in place of Windows Explorer. It has a batch conversion option for images, allowing you to set filetype and size. Works quite well.

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

David is right. I had some CAD files I tried to convert in a batch program. While the program did convert the files, afterward I had to go in manually and touch them all up. Sometime that's why they call it WORK. If you enjoy what your doing then it won't seem like work at all. UNLESS you don't enjoy looking at girls in lingerie!! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/cool.gif

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

Cleaning up noise is a one by one operation, but resizing (assuming you just want the originals all downscaled directly without any cropping) and converting file formats are all batch operations. Doing those parts one by one is pretty silly IMO. Any noise created by conversion would have to be cleaned up one by one either way, and for reduced size web site pics it probably won't be that noticeable. Just make sure to save lossless (PNG) copies before the conversion to smaller jpgs as David suggests.

Photoshop and The GIMP (free) support batch processing, and I believe that Paintshop Pro might as well.

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

Out of curiousity, if I asked for volunteers to help me out with this, how many would I get?

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

You could do the bulk of the resizizing with Photoshop. There's a macro recorder in there somewhere you can use to apply the same settings to multiple files. I used it to change the color of the Cheaters race so they were gold instead of the Default silver.

I don't remember where it is, but I found it with the Photoshop help file. Afterwards you can do the less-repetitive retouching file by file.

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

You can record actions in the actions tab of... the middle pane on the right. Then there is automation in file menu near the bottom to play that action for arbitrary number of files.

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

Wow. I can't believe I just asked for volunteers to spend a couple hours looking at cute girls in their underwear and didn't get any. That's sad, man, really sad.

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

Our Forum Goers are too Tactful (ok, most) to post it publically. This is why Private Messages were invented! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

It also had 'potential setup' written over it in very big letters. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

Well, I'd be happy to help (more than happy really!) but alas! I have no time http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/frown.gif

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

Ug. Just noticed that there isn't one constant resolution for the pics. There's about 4 or 5. So there goes easy batch jobbing. Ah well.... Seriously, if you've got time/inclination to help, PM me coz I'm trying to get this thing done quick.

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

My corel photoshop has a scripting program that is supposed to be able to handle things like that, but I haven't been able to get it to work right yet. If I can figure it out I will let you know.

Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
 

Why gan't you do batch? Every batch processing image software I have seen lets you specifiy a target image size in pixels. Unless you mean they don't have the same aspect ratio, which would definitely suck. Are there cameras that can shoot with configurable aspect ratios? I thought they all used 4:3.