.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Space Empires: IV & V (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Troops are useless (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=34397)

GuyOfDoom April 25th, 2007 08:23 PM

Troops are useless
 
It came up in a recent game of mine. SEV v1.33 w/ BM 1.03a

Basicly it was discoverd that if you load fighters into a cargo bay you can drop them off on a planet like troops and you can capture the planet.

I had weapons platforms, but they appearred to do nothing, which I assume is a seperate bug.

The question is this: Why if fighters can do space AND ground combat would you EVER build troops?

PvK April 25th, 2007 09:27 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
Because if no one has balanced them yet http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/rolleyes.gif , someone should give troop components some advantages over fighter components. Like, fighters probably should require some propulsion which would make them much faster than troops, but more expensive, and troops should probably be able to more economically mount more equipment, since they can use the ground to hold them up... etc.

Arkcon April 25th, 2007 09:35 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
And a decent ground only weapon for weapon platforms would be nice. Something that would make you want to give up tonnage that could be firing into space instead. Sort of a mixed bag of troops, fighters, weapon platforms, militia all mixing it up on ground combat.

se5a April 26th, 2007 04:11 AM

Re: Troops are useless
 
I don't think fighters give happiness.

Suicide Junkie April 26th, 2007 08:19 AM

Re: Troops are useless
 
Why not make troops able to pile on heavy armor, while fighters can't afford the weight.

Q April 26th, 2007 09:00 AM

Re: Troops are useless
 
Or make fighter weapons unable to target troops.

RCCCL April 26th, 2007 10:25 AM

Re: Troops are useless
 
Quote:

Q said:
Or make fighter weapons unable to target troops.

That would push the advantage to far in the other direction, especially since the AI tends to keep a number of fighters in cargo, which are then used in ground combat.

Someone might try creating an AntiAircraft weapon, ie: only targets fighters, with higher damage.

I don't know if it will work though, because I think in ground combat the targeting is a little off. Weaponplatforms will often have DUCs or Laser weapons that should target fighters, but only their point defense weapons fire during ground combat.

Phoenix-D April 26th, 2007 11:52 AM

Re: Troops are useless
 
That's because ground combat gets a separate damage line, and space-based DUCs can't fire during ground combat.

RCCCL April 26th, 2007 12:51 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
I see, so a AA type weapon for troops should work.

GuyOfDoom April 26th, 2007 12:52 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
A point worth noting is that the Weapon's Platforms listed above were equipped with 2x Point Defense Cannons Lvl 4 and 2x Anti-Proton Beams lvl 2.

I think it should be changed such that fighters are only good for space combat or at least are incapable of planet capture without troops.

Fyron April 26th, 2007 03:17 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
You can make such a change in your local copy (preferably in a mod folder, such as copying the file into the "GameTypes\Standard SE5" folder), by editing VehicleUnitTypes.txt.

GuyOfDoom April 26th, 2007 03:49 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
Alas it happened on a PBW game with some friends.

AstralWanderer April 26th, 2007 08:14 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
It seems that the "best" answer would lie with Aaron here...

Ground troops should be a requirement to conquer a planet - a fighter-only force should be restricted to inflicting casualties and/or destroying facilities.

It would also be nice to have the option of using a fleet's main arnament in an orbital fire support role - increasing attacker firepower at the cost of greater planetary destruction (happiness, facilities, etc) and blue-on-blue casualties (which could be reduced with Advanced Military Science research).

narf poit chez BOOM April 26th, 2007 11:09 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
First shouldn't be to hard.

Second would require whole new code sections.

Third option (blue-on-blue casualties) may or may not require new code sections. Shouldn't be too hard with proper programming in place (Just modify the bombardment code (The new code sections) so it occasionally picks a friendly).

Two is the sticking point.

Fyron April 26th, 2007 11:32 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
Yeah, but how many troops would you require? Is a contingent of 1 sufficient?

se5a April 27th, 2007 03:53 AM

Re: Troops are useless
 
it would be modable. also the partucular "unit" required to capture a planet would be modable too. (I hope)

at the moment though, giving troops a 'seeker' which can only target fighters would do the trick - also give more things from the troop weapons tech branch.


I'd make it big enough so that you can't easly fit any other weapons on small troops too, that should help with balancing troops vs fighters.

Fyron April 27th, 2007 02:29 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
The problem is, any amount higher than 1 is completely arbitrary and will lead to stupid mechanics. Say you set it to 50 troops. What if my invasion force is reduced to 49? Even though I've slaughtered all enemy units and militia, I suddenly can't conquer the planet, for lack of 1 troop... makes no sense. If you set it to 1, then its completely meaningless. Just put one heavily armored, unarmed troop unit with your fighter invasion force and you haven't really solved any problem. Any other low number has the same effect.

Baron Munchausen April 27th, 2007 02:45 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
That sounds like we need a hard-coded setting complementary to the "Ground Combat Militia Troop Population Amount" settings. This would be the Troop Occupation Level -- the number of troops necessary to control a population. It's a perfectly realistic idea, as anyone paying attention to the Iraq war would already know. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif If you don't have enough troops to keep up a sufficient presence, the occupied population will revolt. Maybe the original empire doesn't control the planet anymore, but neither do you.

Alternatively, MM could just use the militia setting as the occupation level. Which also makes some sense.

Captain Kwok April 27th, 2007 03:26 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
Alternatively, MM could also making the militia setting amounts actually work as well. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...ies/tongue.gif

But I like the idea. The amount of troops required could also decrease as the enemy population is assimilated - making more use of that aspect of the game.

Fyron April 27th, 2007 03:45 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
Randomly triggering revolts with some generated militia units on an occupied planet is fine; making it impossible to conquer the planet after all defending troops are defeated, just because you have 1 less troop than some arbitrary threshold, is bad game design IMO. Remember, gameplay trumps realism.

Aris_Sung April 27th, 2007 08:28 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
I was hoping that the buildings would be more spread out or grouped into smaller "cities". That way there could be a longer campaign to take over the planet (more strategic) instead of a mad rush from both sides to destroy the other and take over the colony.

narf poit chez BOOM April 27th, 2007 09:39 PM

Re: Troops are useless
 
Given that troops reduce unhappiness and unhappiness governs revolt chances, I'd think this is already covered.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.