![]() |
Devourer of souls
Are these things worth 30 d gems?
I thought i read on here awhile back they were nerfed. They would have to be pretty awesome to be better than 3 tartarian gates(10 d gems each). If they are not better than 3 tartarian gates, what is the point of having them as a conj 9 nationial summons for MA Ctis? |
Re: Devourer of souls
Quote:
|
Re: Devourer of souls
No, I wouldn't say that it is worth thirty death gems since you will have to bring mage support to ensure that he can hit the SC.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
My point is not that they should be better than 3 tartarian gates, but they should not be conj 9. It is pointless to have a conj 9 national summon cost 3 times as much and be not as good as a 10 d gem summon any nation can get.
Maybe make them 10d gems and move them to ench 5. Considering that Tartarians are the damn best thing in the game, how would you weigh anything else against THEM for comparison? not for my money. I will take a gorgon any day. |
Re: Devourer of souls
I think he means for cost effectiveness. I wouldn't pay 120 gems for a gorgon over 30 for a tartarian. (GoRed- 100 vs 10 otherwise.)
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Do it like Sombre does, compare them to Bog beasts.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Souless are free, therefore more cost effective than tartarians. Ha.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
The devourer of souls is a singular entity. He is named Ammit. He doesn't bother about cost effectiveness. He only comes if enough death gems is offered him. Ammit consumes souls. He will consume the soul of the one ridiculing him for inefficiency!
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Will he consume said person's soul efficiently?
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Very efficiently! A bit like ice cream in the jaws of a five year old.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
That really tends to slop everywhere and make a bit of a mess. Not very efficient.
Edit: Umm... Sorry about your thread, Xietor... |
Re: Devourer of souls
/cry.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
But no one can use the ice cream afterwards! Same goes with the soul.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Quote:
GoR him for some extra scripting control. |
Re: Devourer of souls
The soul death effect is tagged as a secondary effect, which means that the bite must hit for it to take effect. Either you are misinformed or there is some special mechanic for the devourer. The effect is irresistible though, like you said. The devourer is not a bad unit, but it is a bit expensive.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
try gift of reason on the devourer, equip with pendant of luck and another boosting armor / defence.
with a good bless he is pretty effective. |
Re: Devourer of souls
Quote:
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Yep, there is. The mod command is #secondaryeffectalways.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
He would certainly be worth the gems if he was a 19-foot long Allipotomus.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Quote:
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Quote:
|
Re: Devourer of souls
In my very limited test, it did not always hit. and since it died so fast, was hard to get much data about it.
And you can only have 1 summoned at a time. I hope that is for some thematic reason and not because these things are considered overpowered. Not only are they not overpowered, id never spend 30 d gems to own one in a real game. Their attack is not even ranged. And despite KO saying it has a name, it is not even a commander. If memory serves it was also a magic being, meaning it can be dispatched fairly easily by a thug dual wielding elf banes. But that is unnecessary, because in my test it died to castle bought units. |
Re: Devourer of souls
If you quicken it, it kills TWO militia a turn.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Give it Flight, & script to HOLD AND ATTACK>REARMOST or LARGE ENEMY MONSTERS
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Why would i spend 20 nature gems, on top of 30 d gems, to get a flying thug that kills things at best at a rate of 1 per turn? Especially one that can die to chaff?
I can think of many better ways to spend those gems at conj 9. It is a fairly cool concept. It is just not slotted appropriately and costs too much. I am far from certain i would rather have a dos or a behemoth, and I am quite certain i would rather have 3 behemoths than a dos. If the attack was ranged, like "life for a life" then it would definitely be worth the 30 d gems and a conj 9 position. Of course then, i think its ammo would need limited to 12, after which it would go trampling. If it is left as is, i think a better position would be conj 5, and reduce it cost significantly. *** I want to point out, as I have in the past, that my criticism/suggestions are my tiny part to make an epic game perhaps even better. Dom III is my favorite strategy game ever, as is, and I think it is awesome that the developers continue to patch and tweak the game-which takes a lot of their time-for free. |
Re: Devourer of souls
Quote:
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Ok,
I will bite. How does MA Ctis give a unit flight without making it gor, since MA Ctis has no air mages? |
Re: Devourer of souls
You build a pretender.
Jazzepi |
Re: Devourer of souls
Not every player playing MA Ctis takes air with their pretender. Next.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Xietor lives in the land of sarcasm lost.
Jazzepi |
Re: Devourer of souls
Of man's first disobediance, and the Fruit
of that forbidden tree, whose mortal words brought irony into the world, and all our woe with loss of humour, 'till one greater joke restore us, and regain the blissful seat Jest, heavenly muse... |
Re: Devourer of souls
Quote:
http://www.pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF006...f_Irony.jpg#75 |
Re: Devourer of souls
You don't use it as a SC-army crusher. You make one and you eat a decked out SC with it. You won't think it's underpowered then.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Unless you are playing LA C'tis you may get fairy queens to cast flight on the devourer.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
1. good point folket-you win a brownie!
2. Sc crusher? I guess that is possible if the sc has a low defense and the attack hits, but would it not make more sense for the same cost to just use a tartarian gate, who can kill sc's and armies? |
Re: Devourer of souls
Quote:
|
Re: Devourer of souls
well a gor tartarian gate is 30 gems-same as ds. Many come equipped with nice weapons.
You may or may not need a heal. And 20 percent of tar gates start as commanders, so you do not always need gor. |
Re: Devourer of souls
You need to invest more than just 30 gems on tartarians to make them stand up to a devourer in most cases. The only tartarians you can really use out of the box are the cyclops and the flying monstrums, neither of which has the stats to really get around the devour soul.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Question: Does the devour soul ability destroy immortal units permanently?
|
Re: Devourer of souls
No.
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Quote:
|
Re: Devourer of souls
Quote:
|
Re: Devourer of souls
From http://ulm.illwinter.com/dom3/dom3progress.html:
29th april * fixed mod command #secondaryeffectalways. * Mac could crash when shift selecting units, fixed. It should work after the patch, and the changelog also promises fixes to #reinvigoration, #aoe, #clearsites and #clearmagic. |
Re: Devourer of souls
Corrected url:
http://ulm.illwinter.com/dom3/dom3progress.html |
Re: Devourer of souls
Huh, the Devourer of Souls always shows up as a commander now. I had a hard time finding it in the progress page, but it's listed in Version 3.10 as: Ammit -> commander.
So, if you were going to give him two misc items, what would it be? Gift of Kurgi and a Lycanthrope Ammy? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.