![]() |
Doom Horror v Seraph
|
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
|
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
Surprisingly cheap equipment for such a gem investment.
|
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
Cheap, but quite effective.
|
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
Considering that you've blown several hundreds of gems empowering in Astral, Wishing for "magic power", Wishing or summoning the unit, and possibly GoRing and/or Wishing for "power", then I certainly hope it can beat a Doom Horror!
Above and beyond equipment, just how much did you spend on this guy? |
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
Let us see:
1. Summoning - 100S + 20N, or 150S 2. Power (at least one) - 100S 3. Magic Power - 100S Xietor may or may not have needed to empower - you can get away without it on your first Seraph. So all in all, this is a cheap Seraph, costing only 300-400 gems. If you had asked me two weeks ago, I'd say "Waste of gems". But in my current game, in which I am a substitute, I inherited two Seraphs. I thought they were a horrible investment, until they wiped, four times so far, much bigger investments pretty much by themselves. One of the fights was against three well equipped (three artifacts, full slots) Tartarians that were laying in ambush for my reaction force. That Seraph paid for itself right then and there. |
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
He empowered. He has a S9, which is base 4, Forbidden Light for +2, magical power for +1, so he needs two more empowers to get his 9 (unless this is a battle pic and he did Northern Lights and Power of the Spheres).
|
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
The background pretty much says that it's not in a battle.
|
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
K, with the Forbidden light, one ring, a cap and a robe, you get +5 to the base 4.
You do not have to empower, and maybe he did not. We can't tell for sure. |
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
But this particular seraph, according to the screenshots, only has Forbidden Light, which leaves three levels of astral magic unaccounted for.
|
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
she was empowered to s6 then wished for magical power. And she also wished for power.
|
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
Quote:
Just saying. |
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
I would take out the vine shield and replace it with a luck shield, hence the seraph will have luck outside of combat as well. Also the seraph won't need to spend a turn casting luck during battle. The luck shield will help more against any human strategies to kill it, yet this might be a SP game. |
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
i am not sure luck helps outside of combat. in particular, i have never seen a mind hunt fail because of luck.
|
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
Quote:
Luck helps on many other types of spells in combat and outside of combat. Why spend a combat turn casting a spell of luck when the seraph can be chopping heads with the fire brand. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif |
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
Those who mess with the forbidden light cannot afford to buff for more than two
turns, or the Maker of Ruins will eat them. That said, personal luck is one of my two buffs. My standard combat Seraph kit is Frostbrand, Magebane, Starshine Cap, Rainbow Armour, Boots of Quickness, Forbidden Light, and an extra item which strenghtens defense/attacks/magic resistance/whatever. This provides 100% resistance to everything, and MR near 30 with a spell. A Seraph equipped in this manner will take on anything that is not designed to take him out. On the other hand, two Bane Lords will split him for breakfast if they are properly equiped. |
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
Hahah - banelords. Well said Tuidjy.
Anti-SCs and mages are why I really dont see the value in investing so much into a single SC chasis like this anymore. IMO, once you get to the late game, where enemy mages are more than likely to be casting all manner of single-target badness (soul slay, disintegrate, petrify, etc) its just not worth it to pile so many gems onto a single unit. |
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
Quote:
|
Re: Doom Horror v Seraph
> > On the other hand, two Bane Lords will split him for breakfast if they are
> > properly equiped. > > What would they need, exactly? One with 10 attacks and other with ability to deal > real damage, or something similar? Exactly. Although 10 attacks is a bit unambitious :-) My favorite kit is two swords of swiftness, a horned helmet, a jade armour, boots of flight, a stone bird, and a trident... for a grand total of 2x(2+2+1+4+1) or twenty attacks. If you have cheap fliers, you can throw two extra attacks with the Chi boots. A SC can have defense left after 22 attacks, but it is not likely. And if it happens, well, Bane Lords are cheap, and so is the equipment I've listed above. The second guy's equipment depends on what you're fighting, obviously, but two attacks from a gate cleaver will spoil everyone's day. Against demons and undead, holy weapons (lance, scourge, flambeau) may be better. Or you can go with dual dusk daggers if you have someone with great strength. And once again, if that particular SC has had 300 pearls dumped into wishing for power, you need more cow bell. By the way, two anti-SC guys is not strictly necessary. In my current game I use a compromise build. I give my Jarls a normal combat kit, and throw a bird of stone in... When they bump into SCs, that is usually enough to swing the balance. Last turn, one unique devil, one bane lord, and two tartarians met their unmaker that way. The Jarls are not strictly anti-SC units, as they are spending rounds on buffing, and they are not exactly expendable, but on the other hand, they are anti-army SCs themselves. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.