.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   TO&Es (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=108)
-   -   advanced era (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=41443)

istol December 2nd, 2008 12:13 PM

advanced era
 
how does the advanced era actually work in sp ?

what does it protect from and what does it not ?

seems to me pretty random protects against anything when it feels like protecting ?

Mobhack December 2nd, 2008 01:12 PM

Re: advanced era
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by istol (Post 656812)
how does the advanced era actually work in sp ?

what does it protect from and what does it not ?

seems to me pretty random protects against anything when it feels like protecting ?

If you need to know the technical nuts and bolts details, then the Mobhack help is the place to go usually.

Mobhack Help -> Units Tab -> ERA Paragraph.


Cheers
Andy

Imp December 2nd, 2008 10:19 PM

Re: advanced era
 
Not wishing to sound rude but take half an hour to read the manuel. Realise it may not be your first language but you ask a lot of questions half of which are covered in it. Anything you then dont understand I will be happy to try & explain if you PM me
John

Marcello December 3rd, 2008 04:32 PM

Re: advanced era
 
And if you are interested in how it works in the real world the following article provides a nice summary.

http://russianarmor.info/Tanks/EQP/era.html

istol December 5th, 2008 05:35 AM

Re: advanced era
 
is it possible that tank that does not have been hit in combat with advanced era 8 is hit and the hit ignores era completely and hit's the norma larmor instead ?

"Numbers from 1 to 10 on a facing are ordinary ERA. Numbers from 11 to 20 are Advanced ERA"

i have never seen era valua greater than 8 and that was advanced era

why ?

Marek_Tucan December 5th, 2008 05:40 AM

Re: advanced era
 
Yep, it is possible. Random numbers and all that. Check out say front ERA of T-90 (real-life I mean), you'll notice there are huge gaps around the gun for example.

Moon Pine December 9th, 2008 07:02 AM

Re: advanced era
 
Several times, my Bradley still got destroyed after its ERA "defeated" the heat.

redcoat2 December 9th, 2008 08:05 AM

Re: advanced era
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by istol (Post 656812)
how does the advanced era actually work in sp ?

what does it protect from and what does it not ?

ERA does not always protect against multi charge weapons. To quote the game manual: “Multi charge ATGM have a higher chance of defeating ERA than plain vanilla HEAT.”

Example of a tandem-charge weapon: The Russian RPG-30

http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/5...ramsrpgwo1.jpg

The ‘decoy’ (1) detonates the reactive armour and the main warhead (2) penetrates the compromised area.

http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/4796/rpg30yv8.jpg

Marek_Tucan December 9th, 2008 08:19 AM

Re: advanced era
 
Actually no, that small RPG-30 rocket is intended to set off active defence systems (AKA CIWS in-game), the weapon itself is plain jane RPG-27 with tandem warhead against ERA.

redcoat2 December 9th, 2008 08:30 AM

Re: advanced era
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Marek_Tucan (Post 658415)
Actually no, that small RPG-30 rocket is intended to set off active defence systems (AKA CIWS in-game), the weapon itself is plain jane RPG-27 with tandem warhead against ERA.

The small rocket is indeed designed to set off CIWS and the warhead is indeed a plain jane RPG with a tandem warhead. I did not know that CIWS was different from ERA in game terms.

redcoat2 December 9th, 2008 09:53 AM

Re: advanced era
 
I've just looked up the weapon for the RPG-30. According to ARMS-TASS it is designated the PG-30. Is it the same as the RPG-27 or is it somehow different? The PG-30 and RPG-27 are both 105mm with a tandem warhead.

P.S. When I wrote 'warhead' in my earlier posts I sometimes meant 'weapon.' Sloppy English on my part. I would go back and edit my mistakes - but I'm too late now.

Marek_Tucan December 9th, 2008 11:12 AM

Re: advanced era
 
I believe I saw it in one article that was posted on the topic on Tank-Net - generally RPG-27, plus that little rocket.
RUMINT has it that it was designed for a Mid-Eastern customer, that would give most likely Syria or Iran.

redcoat2 December 9th, 2008 11:31 AM

Re: advanced era
 
I vaguely remember reading somewhere that Venezuela has also shown an interest in the RPG-30.

The game manual says that ‘Multi charge ATGM’ have a higher chance of defeating ERA than plain vanilla HEAT. I’ve assumed that ‘Multi-charge HEAT’ weapons – such as the newer RPGs – also have a higher chance of defeating ERA. Have I assumed too much? In any case, perhaps I should have used a multi charge ATGM as my example.

DRG December 9th, 2008 01:32 PM

Re: advanced era
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by redcoat2 (Post 658469)
The game manual says that ‘Multi charge ATGM’ have a higher chance of defeating ERA than plain vanilla HEAT. I’ve assumed that ‘Multi-charge HEAT’ weapons – such as the newer RPGs – also have a higher chance of defeating ERA. Have I assumed too much? In any case, perhaps I should have used a multi charge ATGM as my example.


Yes, Multi-charge HEAT also has a higher chance of defeating ERA. That's what they are designed to defeat.

Don

iCaMpWiThAWP December 9th, 2008 02:08 PM

Re: advanced era
 
Is DC-HEAT the same thing that multi-charge HEAt?

Mobhack December 9th, 2008 03:13 PM

Re: advanced era
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iCaMpWiThAWP (Post 658524)
Is DC-HEAT the same thing that multi-charge HEAt?

See the game documentation:

Mobhack Help->Weapons Tab->Weapons Class-> description of class 20+

(class 23 will be the same as for TA-ATGM, but an RPG version, for MBT LAW/NLAW)

Cheers
Andy


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.