![]() |
does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
You can set this in the setup options before a game but I don't think it's working. I set up a TDM game in a huge galactic edge galaxy. There are three AIs plus myself. I was placed very near the lower left corner. It's now become apparent that one of the AIs, the Tessellate, was also placed there--in other words, nothing at all like spacing four players evenly throughout the galaxy. We're pretty much on top of each other.
Anyone have thoughts on this? Does that setup option not really do anything? (I've noticed it before but this was the first time I made a point of noting where the other AIs were.) |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
The rest of the galaxy wasn't filled with uninhabitable systems (nebulas, black holes, etc.) was it?
|
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Does it work? No, absolutly not. Setting the option or not setting it makes no dif. Placement is practically random.
[ July 20, 2003, 22:52: Message edited by: geoschmo ] |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
By the way, are you playing with "bonus"? Would be great to me, know how the Tessellate performed starting close to you. |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
NO |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Most quadrants aren´t even to begin with.
|
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Does it evenly space empires, but not across the quadrant?
|
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
It just flat doesn't work at all. Geoschmo |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
I have to say that this is a really big problem.
I just quit playing my first single-player TDM because of this. I've heard good things about the TDM AIs, particularly the United Flora and the Rage, so I made sure that they were in my game. However, as it turned out, I started out at the very eastern end of the map and had taken control of over a dozen systems before I met the first AI. I was far and away the leading player throughout the entire game. I took control of some of the AIs to see what they were up to and discovered that they were all bunched together. The Rage had started in a system with two warp points, with a Neutral on one side, and another AI empire on the other, and had gotten nowhere (DUC 3 when I had PPB 5 ). I've just started a second TDM game, and this time I've started with two neighbors very close to me, and things are much more interesting and challenging. |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Yeah, I hate it too. I like to play Proportions or AIC with many AIs. But given the insane starting pace of bonused AI, I prefer to have some buffer spece for long entertaining games. Unfortunately, that means low number of AIs http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif
May be i should generate map, place starting positions manualy and load it ? But that will reduce the joy of exploration http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Hehe, in my current game I started in the same system with the Rage and blockaded their homeworld immediately, then researched troops and took them over with minimal fuss. Poor things are my servants now. But my highest-population world is an airless Rage world.
|
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
For some really tense action, try the FQM sphere quadrant. You don't need lots of AIs to make that one hard http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
|
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
As for how the game's going, I'm crushing them simply because I expanded fast and was able to bottle them up in about five systems. I'm about to deliver the coup de grace. So it hasn't been anywhere near as challenging as I'd hoped for. But I'm hoping the Vikings will give me more of a fight. And then there's the United Flora (which I haven't run into yet and I assume are on the far side of the quadrant opposite me), but from looking at the scores, I'm guessing that the Vikings are kicking UF ***. So it'll probably come down to me vs. the Vikings. All that said, I think this match would be ENTIRELY different if the four empires really had started evenly spaced. |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
It just flat doesn't work at all. Geoschmo</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Do you think this is something that could be fixed by a modder or is hardcoded? |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
For some really tense action, try the FQM sphere quadrant. You don't need lots of AIs to make that one hard http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Where's a good place to get custom maps that I can use in this way? I play only huge galactic edge quadrants (basically, the map type that will give the largest number of systems to play in) so that would be the type I was looking for. |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
|
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Hey there, I'm jumping in late but I gotta say, the evenly spaced function does do something -- only when its turned off do you end up with two races in the same system . Really bad if the opponent is the Krill or the Amonkre.
BTW, the TDM modpack races do need at least a small bonus, to defend them against the possibility of starting surronded by meager planets. The Rage should have conqured the neutral and had 2 homeworlds by now. Survive that. United Flora, with religious and organic racial techs, will need a bonus to complete research in a timely fashion. That's why the Space Vikings are winning, they don't use racial tech. I just started a TDM game on medium bonus. Ouch. I have my home system. That's it. I researched frigates. The Krill had destroyers with DUC III. I got APB2 and Shield 2, they have LC, DUC V, Shield III. The Abbidion hate me, and glass worlds in between trade alliances, and to think I used to think they were nice orange puffballs. [ July 21, 2003, 17:00: Message edited by: Arkcon ] |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
One odd thing I realized about placing the empires: As a single human player I almost always have an AI empire in an adjacent system, even if there are few empires in a large quadrant with more than 200 systems. Did you see this too??
|
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
|
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
The solution seems simple to me. We can generate games (choosing starting positions for the AI), then trade savegames. Empires will be evenly distributed but you don't know where they are.
|
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
|
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
i think i am getting the hang of it now.
it is tricky |
Re: does the "place empires evenly throughout galaxy" work?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.