![]() |
Re: OT - A long way to go for a short distance
Perhaps this explains it:
Quote:
|
Re: OT - A long way to go for a short distance
Quote:
[ August 04, 2004, 14:11: Message edited by: Thermodyne ] |
Re: OT - A long way to go for a short distance
5 Billion miles sounds about right for all that. It would be more direct to fly straight from here to Mercury, but doing so would take a tremendous amount of fuel as you'd have to decelerate quite a bit to get into orbit. Otherwise it would only have time to snap a few pictures as it zipped by and on out of the solar system, or a firey death as it plunged into the sun. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif
|
Re: OT - A long way to go for a short distance
Mercury Mission trajectory WEBSITE http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/the_miss...ldto_71204.jpg
|
Re: OT - A long way to go for a short distance
Ok, thanks for the info. None of this was mentioned on the news stories that I heard. All I knew was that Mercury was not 5 billion miles from earth. But the slingshot method does sound logical. Hope we get some pretty good pictures in 5-7 years.
|
OT - A long way to go for a short distance
They just launched a new Mercury probe. Every source I've read or heard says that it will travel 5 BILLION miles before it reaches the planet closest to the sun. That's funny. It's only 93 million miles from the sun to the earth. So, what is this thing going to do? Go to Pluto first, then go to Mercury? Obviously, no one has checked their facts before someone typed this up and now everyone is quoting this as gospel. 5 Billion miles to Mercury?
|
Re: OT - A long way to go for a short distance
I didn't look at all of the arrows, but the ones I looked at looked like circles, not spirals.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.