.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Space Empires: Starfury (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   POLL : 3D or 2D (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=15891)

trooper October 13th, 2003 09:41 AM

POLL : 3D or 2D
 
Well, it seems to be one of the main topics in this forum, so let's make a poll to see what opinions players have about it.

centurion_karon October 13th, 2003 06:24 PM

Re: POLL : 3D or 2D
 
Maybe I'm just too much of a starfleet command junkie, but the games seems to be just fine in 2d. Besides, who wants another ST: bridge commander?

DeadZone October 13th, 2003 06:55 PM

Re: POLL : 3D or 2D
 
It does look fine and what have you
I do think that Aaron could perhaps try his hand at 3D
If it dont work it dont work, but I believe he should at least try

And if it dont, I will settle for 2D anyway
<<<------ Again another SFC Junkie

TerranC October 13th, 2003 10:34 PM

Re: POLL : 3D or 2D
 
3D movements and a better scaling of things wouldn't hurt, but it really doesn't matter.

narf poit chez BOOM October 13th, 2003 11:36 PM

Re: POLL : 3D or 2D
 
i want 3d. homeworld left me with a desire to commant a single ship in large 3d battles. but i still like the game.

milo October 13th, 2003 11:46 PM

Re: POLL : 3D or 2D
 
Quote:

Originally posted by narf poit chez BOOM:
i want 3d. homeworld left me with a desire to commant a single ship in large 3d battles.
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">There are other games that can provide you with that experience. Starfury seems to be more about role-playing and adventuring and improving your ship stats. The "Diablo-in-space" analogy is an apt one.

PvK October 13th, 2003 11:52 PM

Re: POLL : 3D or 2D
 
Hmm. I don't completely agree with any of the statements in the poll here, because they all say (at least partially) something I would not agree with.

I think the fact that it is 2D is just fine. I can do without 3D, especially since the interface would be tricky to do well, and the current interface is tricky enough.

What I would much rather see would be far more realistic proportions of time and size. The enormous ships, miniscule planets, the warped time scale, and their effects on gameplay, time passage, collisions, combat, the resulting starfighter arcade feel, etc., are my biggest turn-offs.

PvK

Mehrunes October 14th, 2003 12:07 AM

Re: POLL : 3D or 2D
 
Quote:

Originally posted by PvK:
What I would much rather see would be far more realistic proportions of time and size. The enormous ships, miniscule planets, the warped time scale, and their effects on gameplay, time passage, collisions, combat, the resulting starfighter arcade feel, etc., are my biggest turn-offs.

PvK

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I've doubled the size of the map and the scale of space objects (besides ships) successfully, but increasing it any more caused slowdowns.

Krsqk October 14th, 2003 12:10 AM

Re: POLL : 3D or 2D
 
Quote:

Originally posted by PvK:
What I would much rather see would be far more realistic proportions of time and size. The enormous ships, miniscule planets, the warped time scale, and their effects on gameplay, time passage, collisions, combat, the resulting starfighter arcade feel, etc., are my biggest turn-offs.
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">My assumption is that all these design decisions were done to make navigation easier. I agree, I would like to see more realistic sizes/distances/travel times (and correspondingly, more increments for speed--up to 16x or 32x). Are they game-breakers for me? No--I can suspend disbelief enough to handle a starbase larger than many planets. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

Is any of this moddable? Because, while I think Aaron would do well to change these (and other) things, the modding community will respond much more quickly. In some ways, this seems almost like a game engine, with a basic outline of what's possible included in the campaigns. I've no doubt that mods will quickly fill the void; and quite possibly, Aaron will work out a more extensive campaign in a future patch. In spite of the shortcomings, though, this is a game I definitely will buy when the $$$ becomes available. Why? Because I believe the gaming experience I will have with this product will far exceed that from any other product out there. The #1 reason--MM's commitment to patching/supporting its products. The #2 reason--the community, especially the great modding gods (and goddesses?) which deign to visit us mortals here at the Shrapnel Boards, bringing their boons to the undeserving. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif

So, to get back on topic, 2D is fine. 3D would be more than icing; I'd rather see the "realism"/believability changes outlined above and mentioned elsewhere before a true 3D navigable environment.

PvK October 14th, 2003 12:30 AM

Re: POLL : 3D or 2D
 
Yeah, I think the comment about comparing SF to SEI or II is a good one. SEIV Gold is so good because it's got many many years of player suggestions incorporated into it. Malfador has really responded to suggestions for years, and that's what made SEIV Gold so satisfying. So I expect that if SF gets plenty of enthusiastic fans making suggestions, it'll become more and more appealing to more and more players. I think it will take more than just modding the original release to completely address some things I mentioned, but I'm sure we'll see many nice improvements in patches, as well as some great mods and new adventures.

PvK


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.