.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Dominions 2: The Ascension Wars (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=55)
-   -   your favourite 2.12 vq nation (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=19791)

Boron August 1st, 2004 12:36 AM

your favourite 2.12 vq nation
 
a short funny poll .
i am curious if my favourite vq nations share interest or are rather uncommon http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif

you may chose several answers in the 3 questions .

Boron August 1st, 2004 12:37 AM

Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
 
to be brief i only listed nations .
if i had listed all themes the number would have increased to about 25.

in question 1 + 2 you may chose as many answers as you want , in question 3 only 1 .

Cainehill August 1st, 2004 01:39 AM

Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
 
My favorite VQ nation is Marignon. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif

Boron August 1st, 2004 01:52 AM

Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Cainehill:
My favorite VQ nation is Marignon. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">lol
vq would fit great into diabolic faith but is not allowed http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif

archaeolept August 1st, 2004 02:04 AM

Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
 
VQ is still a viable choice. It is pricey though, so any nation which allows you to play w/ crap scales will be good.

Zapmeister August 2nd, 2004 04:43 AM

Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
 
I only ever take the VQ with BF Ulm because I think she's thematic for that race/theme.

Stormbinder August 2nd, 2004 05:13 AM

Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Zapmeister:
I only ever take the VQ with BF Ulm because I think she's thematic for that race/theme.
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I agree with Zapmestier. VQ is still overpowered, if you know well how to design and play her, even after the Last patch - although it is now significantly better than before, thanks to devs. But it is indeed quite thematic for BF, and BF could use some boost. For all other themes I would frown on VQs in the games that I orginize/play.

Boron August 2nd, 2004 05:47 PM

Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Stormbinder:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">Originally posted by Zapmeister:
I only ever take the VQ with BF Ulm because I think she's thematic for that race/theme.

<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I agree with Zapmestier. VQ is still overpowered, if you know well how to design and play her, even after the Last patch - although it is now significantly better than before, thanks to devs. But it is indeed quite thematic for BF, and BF could use some boost. For all other themes I would frown on VQs in the games that I orginize/play. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">hm yeah for pan cw and the like the vq is still too good . almost 50% have voted that they build their nation around the vq and not the other way round .
perhaps that is really a sign that vq is still too good .
i like the vq a lot ( i started playing in 2.12 so i never saw a pre 2.12 vq ) but i have to admit that she really is a small bit too good still .

i have thought of how to make a lich ( for ryleh e.g. ) a semivq at least midgame but he would need so pricy equipment that it is not worth it .
with no regeneration + a dagger as starting weapon i think it is impossible to use him as an indyexpansion earlygame sc .
no other sc can be used as riskless for early game expansion because all others have either always the small risk to gain a really nasty battle affliction or they have recuperation / immortality but are otherwise too weak to be used as sc .

perhaps i should start a new poll asking about the vq , nerfing it down a little bit more by the following :
forbidding her for most nations . only allow her for thematic natioins :
pan cw , ermor , bf ulm , abysia .
at least disallow her for pythium , caelum , arco .
increase her path costs to 60 or 70 .

this way the basic high dominion , 2-3 E , optional 2-3 A , 2+D , 1+B , 2+ W vq will be really hard to pay for e.g. pythium/caelum and so still be worth it for ermor but not be imbalanced (+ very thematic http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif ) .

but at the moment she still is perhaps a slightly too good pretender for the races which can afford lousy scales .


do you think i should try to make a new thread / poll which perhaps results in small changes which balance the vq even more ?

nakomus August 2nd, 2004 08:24 PM

Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
 
First of all, let me say, I really don’t want to start a flame war about game balance here. Just expand on my own poll response, mainly. I’m not exactly an expert at MP. But my vote would be for the VQ to be left alone for now.

I’m one of the people who voted that they built there strategy around the VQ (with Abysia). By that I meant that the VQ was an integral part of the strategy, not that she was the whole point of the strategy. The Last time I played with a VQ and Abysia I used her for early expansion and extra defense in my dominion so I could focus on getting my blood economy going. I didn’t choose Abysia because they have extra points to dump into a VQ; I choose the VQ because I wanted to focus on Abysia’s magic and she let me do that.

I said that I based on strategy around the VQ because the strategy as a whole would not have worked well without her or something similar.

It seems to me that ones strategy should be based around your pretender god; they are afterall what the game is about.

With the VQ forbidden to Ermor now, Pan CW is probably in first place for disposable points to sink into a VQ. From reading these Boards, I get the impression that CW is a weak theme. Even with a tricked out VQ, is CW really overpowered?

Quote:

forbidding her for most nations . only allow her for thematic natioins :
pan cw , ermor , bf ulm , abysia .
<font size="2" face="sans-serif, arial, verdana">I don’t really agree that the VQ is thematic for Ermor and Pan CW. Although she is undead, she feeds on the blood of the living. A vampire in a killer dominion will starve (I know I’m not the first to point this out, but I forget who brought it up first).

If you do want to poll about balance, I think you should put it in the context of specific nations:

Is Pan CW with a VQ unbalanced?
Is Abysia with a VQ unbalanced?
Would Ermor with the patched VQ be unbalanced? (although its removal was I think partially thematic)

Even if the VQ is a little better than her competitors, I’d rather see the effort spent on improving the worst pretenders rather than dragging down the best.

Vynd August 2nd, 2004 09:12 PM

Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
 
I was in favor of weakening the VQ before, but I think it is too soon to say if she needs to be weakened again. It does seem to me that she remains the most powerful combat Pretender you can get starting out the game. In the late game other Pretenders and summons can also be very strong with the right equipment, but the VQ comes with so many nice abilities built in that nothing really compares early on. But something has to be the best fighting Pretender early in the game. It might as well be her.

The problem before, at least as Illwinter seems to have seen it, was that the VQ was both an excellent fighter and Rainbow. The only reason you wouldn't take her is if you wanted a bless effect or wanted to dump most of your points into scales/dominion/forts.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.