![]() |
Accuracy values for the main guns - MBT\'s.
This one being my first post here, I would like to thank Andy, Don, & The Camo Workshop for what is, IMHO, the best version of SP ever - God, after 10 years - SP, SP2, SP3, SPWAW - I can reverse a tank!!http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/cool.gif
However, perhaps the accuracy (for the tank's main guns) values should be reviewed, since my impression is that they do not represent the tank gun's actual accuracy. The rule of thumb in WinSPMBT is "the length in calibers divided by 4" (this is from the manual, under the item "Accuracy"). So, a German 120mm L/55, will have an accuracy value of 14, and the German 120mm L/44 will have an accuracy value of only 11... The same with the American M256 of the all versions of the M1A1/A2. And the Israeli 120mm of the Merkava and each and every tank that uses some 120mm L/44, too. And then we have the British Challenger's guns, with an accuracy value going up to 16 (I am not bashing the British rifled 120mm guns - they are deadly accurate, but perhaps not so much more than the German 120mm L/44, which has a value of only 11), and the Soviet/Russian 125mm guns a value of 13. Would Rheinmetall design a gun less accurate than the Soviet 125mm guns? I don't believe so. That's against the company's tradition and reputation. And no, I don't work for Rheinmetall...;) I just want to point out that maybe gun length is not the best factor in determining tank gun accuracy, there are many other factors involved such as the quality of the materials used in the gun itself and how it behaves with the propellant used, the chamber pressure, etc. All these factors are exclusive of the tank gun itself, not the FCS. And they are relevant where accuracy is concerned. I am really not convinced of the "longest gun is the most accurate one" accuracy principle, specially when the latest tank guns are compared to the old Soviet guns. I mean, by the time of their respective development and posterior deployment, why the Hell would Germany and the US implement a gun on the Leopard 2 and M1A1 Abrams that were less accurate than the guns used in the same Soviet tanks they were supposed to defeat? Again, I am not speaking of the effects of the different FCS systems used, I am referring to raw gun accuracy. Most respectfully, I would like to hear Andy and Don's comments on this issue. |
Re: Accuracy values for the main guns - MBT\'s.
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/happy.gif
Hullo kevineduguay1... **Waves** http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif If you're not, then appolgies. There's been this disscussion over at the DosMBT group, the following reply was given (Edward is talking about the formula used for working out the ACC): Quote:
|
Re: Accuracy values for the main guns - MBT\'s.
In fact, US Army had accuracy problems during testing german 120mm L55 Gun firing new US APFSDS rounds (M829A2,M829A3)Its accuracy with this rounds was much worse than with M256 gun (L44)
|
Re: Accuracy values for the main guns - MBT\'s.
Discusion on Yahoo board is quite big. Accuracy system works great until 1970, after this date new ammunitions are avaiable and this should be taken into account. I know that most of datas are classified, so you need a formula that will work for all tanks with data avaiable. My sugesstion is use L/D ratio of APFSDS projectiles as measurment for accuracy and degree of technology of tank gun. Soviet tank guns were quite unaccurate at ranges over 1600m,they used APFSDS rounds with L/D ratio 10:1 - 13:1,newest projectiles has better accuracy (BM-42,BM-42M etc...)guns that fires them are upgraded so they can fire longer rounds with better L/D (20:1, autoloader prevents to use longer rounds such as US M829A2 or A3 with L/D 30:1 - 37:1).Western tanks started with L/D 10:1 (M735) but they develop better ammo quite soon as M774(not so sure but it is in L/D 15:1 - 20:1 region) M833 (L/D around 20:1) or M900 (L/D 30:1).
Im not suggesting use L/D value as a acc value, but just better variable than lenght of gun.Soviet HEAT ammo for example are stated as more accurate as APFSDS rounds (0,2mil dispersion for HEAT-FS and 0,25-0,3mil for APFSDS) |
Re: Accuracy values for the main guns - MBT\'s.
Quote:
I don't think that a 2 points difference is ridiculous, because it affects not only the Abrams, but also the Leo 2 (up to the A4), Merkava...etc. What seems ridiculous is Western 120mm L/44 being rated as inferior to old Soviet 125mm guns. I am not ignoring other problems with the accuracy formula, it's just that as I have a little more knowledge on tank guns performance, it came to my attention first. By this formula, who can garantee that even the Leo 2A6 120mm L/55 accuracy of 14 is right? Or even the Challenger's rilfed guns? What we need is a better general formula. Finally, I still remain with the same doubts I posted.http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/confused.gif But thanks for the answer, anyway. |
Re: Accuracy values for the main guns - MBT\'s.
Quote:
|
Re: Accuracy values for the main guns - MBT\'s.
Quote:
|
Re: Accuracy values for the main guns - MBT\'s.
Quote:
By the way, i have some numbers about our Slovak modernisation of 2A46 gun (2A46MS) from Slovak military bulletin, gun during tests was 30% more accurate than original gun |
Re: Accuracy values for the main guns - MBT\'s.
Quote:
|
Re: Accuracy values for the main guns - MBT\'s.
yes,i will post them, yust need to translate them to english,tomorow
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.