OT: Pluto Not A Planet!
 

Its true, Pluto is no longer considered a planet persay.

Link
NY Times

Today they say Pluto is NOT, repeat, NOT a plant now. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/frown.gif

Re: OT: Pluto Not A Planet!
 

Imagine all the text books that are now wrong...

Re: OT: Pluto Not A Planet!
 

Burn them all!

It's a sad day for Plutonians.

Re: OT: Pluto Not A Planet!
 

What exactly is a darf planet and how will that relate to SEIV? Is it smaller than a tiny planet? Will we have to update all of the stellor files? Oh and poor Fyron, I fear an update for FQM and FQM D is needed now.

Darf Planets... ROTFLMAO

Re: OT: Pluto Not A Planet!
 

Science textbooks are always out of date by the time they are published anyway.

Re: OT: Pluto Not A Planet!
 

Well, Pluto being demoted I think is better than making Charon into a planet like they were proposing earlier.

Maybe oneday they'll discover another planet beyond Pluto and bring the total up to 9 again, though that's unlikely.

Re: OT: Pluto Not A Planet!
 

Nah, we'll just take Chauron, Pluto, and a few old russian sats and duct tape it together to get the mass required for a planet.

Re: OT: Pluto Not A Planet!
 

Seems to me like this is one big beaurocratic screw up.

The IAU put together a special committee to define the word "planet" two and a half years ago!

Several days ago they release what they finally came up with, after two and a half years of painstaking (yeah right) debate and research...and what happens? A few astronomers get together, slap a different definition together and that's the one they go with!

I just find it so utterly stupid that a committee could debate this on and off for so long, and have their careful definition fall victim to a quickly slapped together definition. Oh how horrible beaurocracy can be!

On a slightly more serious note, I think the definition they've gone with is utterly senseless. From what I've heard, the new definition relies on some vague terminology to work. For example, for a planet to be a planet it has to be the dominant body in its "neighborhood"...OK, so what is a planet's neighbourhood? What do they mean by has to be the "dominant body"? Does this mean that, if we discover two planets the size of Jupiter sharing the same orbit (could easily happen around some other star), does that mean that neither one fits the definition of "planet" since neither one really dominates it's neighborhood? After all, two objects can't "dominate" the same neighborhood, can they?


Personally, I highly favor a definition based upon gravity or mass. Either one, it sets a definite limit.

Heh, and they still haven't defined the upper limit on planetary size...wonder how they'll screw that one up??

Re: OT: Pluto Not A Planet!
 

ROTFLMAO !!!

Re: OT: Pluto Not A Planet!
 

I can't remember who said it but yesterday was an "undiscovery" for the human race http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/frown.gif

At least now I can grow up to be a crotchety and ripe age and tell my grandchildren that "when I was a lad we had 9 planets!"