\"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
 

What, roughly, do a 2-pounder, six pounder and twenty-five pounder equal in terms of millimeters? Those Brits are so confusing and I presume the "pounder" doesn't refer to the cost of the weapon.

Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
 

2 lbr = 40mm
3 lbr = 47mm (Tank gun only)
6 lbr = 57mm
13 lbr = 76mm (pre WWI piece some used as AA early WWII)
17 lbr = 76.2mm
18 lbr = 84mm (Field gun - some converted to 25lbr)
20 lbr = 84 0r 83.4mm (post WWII)
25 lbr = 87.5mm

There were others used in WWI but well out of service by WWII.

Keep in mind that other factors such as barrel length, type of round and charge used need to be considered when assessing the relative power of guns. While of equal calibre, the 25 lbr was much shorter than the German 88 and performance was much less as well. Similarily, the 17 lbr was much longer (and I believe had a heavier charge) than its Russian brothers so had considerably better performance.

Note that while often looked down on, for its time the 2 lbr was a kick *** AT gun.

Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
 

BTW. There is an official abbreviation of pdr rather than lbr. 6pdr (eg).

I think the 3pdr was much more likely to be found on ships than tanks by ww2.

British ATG used a much hotter load then US and more again than Soviet. Shells could be expected to be of higher quality than soviets, significantly so. Hence solid shells were less likely to shatter on impact and HE shells had more HE content for their calibre and probably more effective content as well. Soviet shells had to have thicker casings than most other countrues like german or US because they couldn't guarantee the tolerances. Iirc 15% less generally.
As if that wasn't enough, the fuses were less reliable.

Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
 

Sorry - I voluntarily took latin in highschool.http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/eek.gif

You're right about the 3pdr, I looked at weapons in the general time frame of the game - 30's to late 40's.

Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
 

It's quite odd really.
Though maybe less interesting to people less ww2 obsessed.
Anyhow and fwiw.

The British used a number of french 25mm ATG in 1940, which weren't too brilliant for that time even. They don't seem to have used any of the french 47mm though. Which they might have called 3pdr.
The French 47mm was a very good gun for that time but presumably the French didn't feel they had a surplus.

The 2pdr was good but the ammo wasn't so brilliant until late 1941 I think. The introduction of face hardening on pz4 particularly highlit the fact that the original design of AP had a tendency to shatter.

Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
 

How did the British call the 47mm Böhler gun? IIRC some were used with the paras before 6pdr.

Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
 

Are you talking about the use of captured Italian guns in Sicily? Ponte Grande bridge?
Because that's the only time they used them I'm aware of.

Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
 

IIRC they've used them as a filler between nothing and 6pdr after they were captured so the Sicily might really be the only place they were used.

Re: \"pounder\" v. millimeter equivalents
 

Ah...
I'm 99% certain:

They captured them in sicily.
On dropping by the bridge they found there were italians there and took them on.
Having beat these they found they now had a couple of ATG still intact.
Used them, AFAIK, just at the bridge.
The italian 47mil was fairly handy and had a useful he round. Not so brilliant as an ATG but...
Pretty sure they didn't keep them afterwards.
So never official equipment.

The paras themselves only ever had PIATS in ww2.
It's the air landing had guns like the 6pdr.
They landed in gliders so could have heavy weapons.
Paras at ponte grande, different people.