![]() |
E9n9 Bless
Multiple times now, I have had an E9N9 Anusara blessed apparently get no prot bonus, while he regenerates normally.
Is this known behaviour? Examining further, a palan 12. After bless, 15. Again normal regen. How does this work... e9 = +4 prot - and it works ok for niefle. Berserk +2.......??? |
Re: E9n9 Bless
Yep. The E4 bless adds +4 to body armor and helms (and misc armor like bracers).
Since the Anusara just has a shield, he does not get +4 anywhere. Try a Kala-Mukha, he'll get +4 on the helm, +4 on the body. Palankashas get +4 on the body only. |
Re: E9n9 Bless
Quote:
Prot = BaseProt + ArmorProt * (1 - BaseProt/40). It starts out as 5 Base and 10 Armor soo Berserk adds to base prot, or 7 + 14 * (1-7/40) = 18. AHHH I got it The formula is actually wrong. The correct formula is: Prot = (BaseProt + ArmorProt) * (1-BaseProt/40). So, interestingly, the higher the base protection the less usefull an earth bless. |
Re: E9n9 Bless
Palankashas have base 5 protection. The earth bless does not add to that.
They also have a Cuirass, which is 10 protection. So, if you click on the 'Protection 12', you see: Base 5 Protection 12 Head 5 Body 15 (5+10) An E9 blessed Palankasha is going to show: Base 5 Protection 15 (or is it 14?) Head 5 Body 19 (5 + 10 + 4) I don't know the formula for getting Protection from Head and Body, but it's just an average with more weight on the body. |
Re: E9n9 Bless
He counted the +2 to base prot from regeneration as well.
|
Re: E9n9 Bless
Endo, I was considering the situation before they berserk. Or are you talking about Chris's calc? Sorry, I was going from memory in my numbers above, so they are off.
In any case, a Gibbor is only base protection 2, but loses one mystery protection point when donning armor. At base 5, the Palankasha loses 1 on armor, and also only gains +3 on armor pieces from an E9 bless. Chris, your formula looks pretty good. Where did you get it from? |
Re: E9n9 Bless
I was talking about Chris's calculations. It looked like you were answering to his post.
|
Re: E9n9 Bless
Quote:
|
Re: E9n9 Bless
I am probably just misunderstanding something, but this:
Quote:
It would mean that an entity without armour would have a protection lower than its base protection as long as that base protection was 7 or more. A Cyclops with 10 levels of earth magic would have a base protection of 30, but a total protection of only 8. |
Re: E9n9 Bless
Quote:
Jazzepi |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.