Curse of Stones
 

I'm curious about the alteration spell Curse of Stones. How useful do people think the spell is and does it affect people with high encumbrance more drastically than people with low encumbrance?

Re: Curse of Stones
 

Its a niche spell, but it can be pretty darn useful under the right circumstances. It doesn't explicitly affect people with higher encumbrance more, though they are more likely to be suffering from fatigue problems so indirectly yes.

It really shines I find against good non-elite heavy infantry/cavalry (which are very common...say you're fighting Abysia or Pythium or EA Ermor or Man or Ulm or etc.). Cast it opening round with two mages equipped with a void eye - very doable early on. What happens is 2/3rds of that big army of bad *** heavy hitters take a point of fatigue every step so they're more than half passed out by the time they get to. The point of the spell is not to try to make the enemy pass out though, it's to make them enter round one of melee with 50+ fatigue. 50+ fatigue for them gives them -5 attack/defense which is the equivalent of level 10 fire/water blessing for your guys (the high chance of a critical hit due to fatigue is arguably similar to having flaming weapons against heavy armor). If combat drags on (which is what heavy infantry excels at) they *do* pass out. Then, the extra tasty icing on the cake is when they route they keep passing out every other step so even if you've got slow heavy infantry yourself you can kill every one if them (that was affected by the spell at least).

Niche spell, but I've never seen anyone other than myself cast it so I think it's under appreciated because it can be very effective given it's research level and ease to cast.

Re: Curse of Stones
 

I heard it affected your own troops as well. Is this true?

Re: Curse of Stones
 

I cast it once against Machaka and it seemed to affect a lot of my troops as well. At least there were a load of stone icons on my troops. I suppose it is possible Machaka acst it too, but I am not sure it is a spell he can easily cast.

So while it looks good per the manual I am not sure I would dare cast it again....

Re: Curse of Stones
 

Yeah, pretty sure it affects friendly troops too. It has it's uses in late-game rather, but not as a single spell.

Re: Curse of Stones
 

No way, it doesn't affect your own troops, that would be pretty crappy. Maybe that's why nobody uses it if that's the perception. The description even says enemy troops, and it's easy to verify as there's a special icon that appears on the character sheet when it takes effect. It is a +4 to the MR save though so I find it useful to cast it a couple times with cheap penetration boosters to get a good coverage. It also rapidly loses its effectiveness the later in combat you cast it, thus the suggestion to cast it with a few mages turn one.

Re: Curse of Stones
 

Oh, also it's a die roll each step, not 1 fatigue. As I implied, I find combined with "hold and attack" from your back row the enemy is roughly at 50-60 fatigue when you start fighting while your troops are fresh.

Re: Curse of Stones
 

Dunno, maybe it was bugged at some point? Definitely doesn't now.

Re: Curse of Stones
 

Well I'll try it again at some point. Because it certainly seems a very useful spell from the description. And it was possible machaka also cast it as it was a mp game. I certainly saw the icons.

Even if it does affect your own troops it might still be worth casting if you have a decent MR advantage. Maybe after casting anti magic which is another fairly early battlefield wide spell?

Re: Curse of Stones
 

Wow if it doesn't effect your own troops then it's excellent. I always thought it did.