.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Dominions 3: The Awakening (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=138)
-   -   Barbarian leader question (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=47819)

sansanjuan September 27th, 2011 04:18 AM

Barbarian leader question
 
Anyone have an idea why an un-berzerked (unwounded) barbarian leader, placed way in the back, scripted to stay behind troops would charge the front lines? Is there a language barrier? Was he only pretending to read the orders? or... :bug: ?
-ssj

Soyweiser September 27th, 2011 05:01 AM

Re: Barbarian leader question
 
Because he does not count your troops guarding them as a valid target for the stay behind troops order. You should add some archers.

JonBrave September 27th, 2011 05:13 PM

Re: Barbarian leader question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Soyweiser (Post 784558)
Because he does not count your troops guarding them as a valid target for the stay behind troops order. You should add some archers.

Sorry (:o), I don't understand either of these sentences. Would you mind elaborating, please?

TigerBlood September 27th, 2011 06:02 PM

Re: Barbarian leader question
 
'Guard Commander' is an order given to a squad.

'Stay behind troops' is an order given to a commander.

A commander will not stay behind any troops guarding them.

A squad of archers (assuming they do not have the Guard Commander order) is an example of troops that should be used in conjuction with the 'Stay behind troops' order.

JonBrave September 27th, 2011 06:42 PM

Re: Barbarian leader question
 
Thank you, I just about follow. But the OP didn't even mention having any guards, nor would that explain about "charging the front line" (unless you mean the commander would attack if all other troops had gone forward, I guess....)

sansanjuan September 27th, 2011 07:59 PM

Re: Barbarian leader question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Soyweiser (Post 784558)
Because he does not count your troops guarding them as a valid target for the stay behind troops order. You should add some archers.

Soy,
Thanks for the answer but the only troops (way in front) were set to attack closet. No GCs in play.
-ssj

thejeff September 27th, 2011 08:16 PM

Re: Barbarian leader question
 
"Stay behind troops" means stay right behind the troops. He'll advance to farthest back squad. If that's at the front line, he'll be right there behind them.

sansanjuan September 28th, 2011 09:14 AM

Re: Barbarian leader question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thejeff (Post 784632)
"Stay behind troops" means stay right behind the troops. He'll advance to farthest back squad. If that's at the front line, he'll be right there behind them.

tj
Thanks. Odd I haven't noticed that before. Lacking an order "spread picnic blanket and sip Merlot on back lines" I'll have to opt for hold x5 and stay behind troops if I'm without an archer squad.
ssj

Knai September 28th, 2011 09:49 AM

Re: Barbarian leader question
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sansanjuan (Post 784662)
Quote:

Originally Posted by thejeff (Post 784632)
"Stay behind troops" means stay right behind the troops. He'll advance to farthest back squad. If that's at the front line, he'll be right there behind them.

tj
Thanks. Odd I haven't noticed that before. Lacking an order "spread picnic blanket and sip Merlot on back lines" I'll have to opt for hold x5 and stay behind troops if I'm without an archer squad.
ssj

A cheap magic bow and the Fire order can also work well for this. Just make sure you don't use a Bow of War or similar with a low precision commander, as friendly fire tends to end poorly.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.