![]() |
Repel
I don't have my manual on hand (and I've learned not to trust it, anyway!), so can someone tell me about the repel effect of long weapons? I feel like I remember it involving a morale check, is that right? In short, what is it all about, and is it worth recruiting pikemen for it?
Shields have always seemed more important to me, and when I need two-handed weapons, I overlook pikes in favor of more damaging ones. Am I mistaken to do so? When do I want pikes/longspears? |
Re: Repel
In theory, repel is a poor mans Awe that only works once per turn and only against people with shorter weapons that you can also hit. In practice it is bugged and you should probably just go with the weapon that causes more damage instead.
|
Re: Repel
Thanks, I didn't know about the once per turn part!
I ran some tests, and it does not seem very effective. Even with fear spam to lower enemy morale, I noticed only a small reduction in hits on my pikemen. |
Re: Repel
tried this many times with ulmish pikemen, and couldn't really get any good results. swiched to tower shields for surviveablity or twohanded weapons for damage.
too bad it doesn't work, cus it's a cool idea. |
Re: Repel
From the manual:
Repel is how Dominions represents the effectiveness of long weapons, such as halberds, pikes, and the like. If a unit attacks an enemy who has a longer weapon than the attacker, the defender may actually repel the attack and prevent it from happening. This occurs as follows. Any defender that has a longer weapon than the one used by its attacker makes a repel attack automatically upon being attacked. Attack and defense rolls are made. If the result is a hit, the attacker must make a morale check or immediately abort his attack. If the attacker passes the morale check, he may make his attack, but the defender’s attack then generates damage and protection rolls. If damage is inflicted, the attacker takes one point of damage and finishes his attack. This simulates the defender successfully placing his longer weapon between himself and the attacker. All of this occurs before the attacker’s strike is resolved. Note that units with low morale are more likely to be repelled, and thus using long weapons against low-morale troops is very effective. Also, units with claws and bites (weapon length zero) are easier to repel. A unit gets -2 to its Repel roll for each time it has been attacked that turn. So it’s easier to repel the first attack than the second, and so on. Translation: Defender (guy trying to repel): Attack rating + DRN vs Attacker (guy trying to get past the repel): Defense rating + DRN If the defender wins, then: Defender: Morale + DRN vs Attacker: Morale + DRN If the defender wins at this stage, the attack is over and you avoid damage. If the attacker wins the morale check, he then goes on to make a normal attack role vs the defender, but the defender gets to roll up to a 1-damage hit against the attacker's prot (woo!). In other words, it isn't just the length of your weapon; it's how you use it. Confidence matters, too. |
Re: Repel
Thanks Kungfoo, that's exactly what I was looking for!
This time I tested with Heart Companions (longspear) with a f8N9 bless. With attack 20 and 99 morale, I was actually able to notice a good number of free attacks. A far from optimal bless, but entertaining. Less extreme cases (marignon pikemen + growing fury) didn't produce noticeable results, so I don't think I'll be building any repel-based strategies. |
Re: Repel
Its an interesting little niche:
Wrathful Skies & Blood rain can make repel viable, and these combinations are very rarely used or considered in conjunction with Repel, and so can be a surprise to an opponent (and fun!). Combine with fear units to force a rapid route. Beware berserck/undead (...) as always of course. |
Re: Repel
So is it "In practice it is bugged", or is it as per the manual?
|
Re: Repel
Also, since longer weapons enable you to attack first, there's a chance you'll kill or maim your opponent preventing him from damaging you
|
Re: Repel
Quote:
So I think repel is limited to being a "nice when it happens" sort of thing, but not something to build a strategy around. Even using longspear/pikes as line-holders, as Bat/man suggested, is only viable some of the time (like if the enemy has no ranged weapons). Otherwise, troops with shields would generally be better line-holders. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.