![]() |
Egyptian-Libyan war miniseries (1977)
1 Attachment(s)
Hello guys!
Here come my promised three scenarios, the miniseries, covering the little known Egyptian-Libyan war of 1977. That was was a short conflict between the two states. The was was epically lost by the Libyans. It's significance is greater than one may think, as Anwar Sadat (president of Egypt) broke the Libyans in just 4 days and had ALL THE ABILITY to depose and remove Quaddafi forever. So as you can easily guess, his decision directly allowed certain other conflicts to happen, such as Chad, Lockerbie bombings, 2011 Libyan Civil War etc. Allright, dropping the historical part now, here are the scenarios and their appropriate descriptions: Quote:
|
Re: Egyptian-Libyan war miniseries (1977)
1 Attachment(s)
Here comes the second one...
Quote:
|
Re: Egyptian-Libyan war miniseries (1977)
1 Attachment(s)
And the third one...
Quote:
|
Re: Egyptian-Libyan war miniseries (1977)
5 Attachment(s)
I played the third of the miniseries.
Fun. Interesting. Entertaining scenario. I decided to approach the target from the swamp area after having found several clear paths. I assessed the Libyans would consider the swamp as a barrier and position their main forces orientated to the left, top, and bottom of their camp. Observations Working with a weapons platoon is problematic. Consider inserting RPG and MMG teams within the two platoons. This decision would have been made before "dust off" anyway. The Egyptian company is short a platoon. Oh well, it was Donald Rumsfeld who said, "...you go to war with the army you have..." From the scenario text: "You are a commander of two Egyptian commando heliborne assault companies and a weapons company." I got a marginal victory http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/attac...1&d=1510274456 Insert RPG and MMG teams within a platoon on the same bird Thanks SaS TrooP! <br> |
Re: Egyptian-Libyan war miniseries (1977)
What do you mean "short by platoon"? Any sources indicating they should have 4 combat platoons? Or as "short by platoon" you mean lack of weapons platoon?
I got no data here, but there are still many armies that keep weapons company under battalion command and have no weapons platoon whatsoever. |
Re: Egyptian-Libyan war miniseries (1977)
Quote:
While weapons companies are under battalion command and their teams train together under separate leaders than the rifle companies, when weapon teams are tasked to rifle companies, they are nominally done so by weapons squad to rile platoon or weapons platoon to rifle company. A battalion may have three companies normally, with a weapons company of three platoons to support the rifle companies. I checked the database utility for the Egyptian OOB and found the commando company, formation 210, is available between '60 to '68. Although there are no helicopter commando formations, all the Egyptian rifle companies, including the commando company, are composed of three rifle platoons. So, if your rifle company of two platoons was by design, no problem with me as I cited Rumsfeld, "...you go to war with the army you have..." Na zdrowie! <br> |
Re: Egyptian-Libyan war miniseries (1977)
Never really heard of any serious commando unit (not pure special purpose like Spetznatz) having just two combat platoons. This is dramatically inferior man and firepower...
|
Re: Egyptian-Libyan war miniseries (1977)
Minor issue: In The battle scenario, the Libyan unit BG7 arrives in a grey hex off map.
|
Re: Egyptian-Libyan war miniseries (1977)
now corrected for the patch... there are actually three trucks deployed on grey hexes
|
Re: Egyptian-Libyan war miniseries (1977)
Must have missed it while testing. Thank you!
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.