Scenario reviews
 

At the urging of DRG I am embarking on a review of all of the SPWW2 scenarios.

I will be rating them on:

1. Difficulty (Easy/Medium/Hard/Very hard)

2. Size (Based on the number of units)
(Small/medium/large/huge)

3. Time to play (Based on actual time to play, not turns)
(Short/medium/long/very long)

4. If playable from either side (y/n) and difficulty as player 2

5. Enjoyability (1 dreadful 5 very fun) added by Scorpio Rocks

6. Special conditions: No tanks, no artillery, Airborne operation, Amphibious operation, Human is to be player #2 (added 2/8)

I encourage other players to post in this thread and give their evaluations based on the above criteria.

My goal is to collect data that can be later put into a sortable database for player to find what kind of scenario they are looking for.

Re: Scenario reviews
 

Scenario #1 Organized Chaos

Difficulty: Easy
Size: Small
Time: Short
Playable from either side: yes Medium as player 2
Enjoyability 3

Re: Scenario reviews
 

Scenario #2 Stonne

Difficulty: Easy
Size: Medium
Time: Short
Playable from either side: yes medium as player 2
Enjoyability 3

Re: Scenario reviews
 

Scenario #3 Monastery Hill

Difficulty: Easy
Size: Medium
Time: Medium
Playable from either side: yes medium as player 2
Enjoyability 4

Re: Scenario reviews
 

Scenario #4 Grastrom's Raid

Difficulty: Easy
Size: Small
Time: Short
Playable from either side: yes Hard as player 2
Enjoyability 2

Re: Scenario reviews
 

Scenario #5 Beisfjord

Difficulty: Easy
Size: Small
Time: Short
Playable from either side: yes Easy as player 2
Enjoyability 3

Re: Scenario reviews
 

I think it would be nice for you to include a 1-5 rating for your "enjoyment" / "scenario quality" too - I realise this is subjective but is valid and useful.


Also a "replayability" rating - ie is the scenario a one-trick pony or finely crafted giving new nuances on several playthroughs.

Re: Scenario reviews
 

Good idea.

Added.

Re: Scenario reviews
 

I guess this is x/5?

Re: Scenario reviews
 

yes 1/5