![]() |
Trounced on home turf ?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-exercise.html
Quote:
......sometimes a plan works....sometimes it doesn't Further----- https://www.military.com/daily-news/...-29-palms.html and alternate views...... https://coffeeordie.com/marines-dominated-by-british/ https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/new...ning-exercise/ Quote:
|
Re: Trounced on home turf ?
Having been out to 29 Palms and NTC for different exercises with our allied nations joining in, I can say it does take things to a whole new level, there is less asinine stupidity from the battalion and higher commanders and we actually get to do our jobs vs worrying so much about the minor factors. It is amazing how the minor issues seem to vanish during these events but can't seem to go away during normal training events. Odd...but then again when you have everyone looking at you from different commands and such I guess some things become less important for worry.
|
Re: Trounced on home turf ?
What would be most instructive would be the roster of troop strength by nationality involved in this exercise. So far, I have not found one
|
Re: Trounced on home turf ?
Quote:
One was BLACK ALLIGATOR 15 conducted from Aug. 5 through Oct. 15. https://www.29palms.marines.mil/Arti...udes-with-bbq/ that one involved Quote:
https://www.joint-forces.com/exercis...-in-the-mojave Quote:
https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-an...n-green-dagger Quote:
Quote:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michael...h=7f0aa24265f0 https://www.forces.net/news/royal-ma...fornian-desert and finally......... https://taskandpurpose.com/voices/us...ning-exercise/ Quote:
Now what is interesting about that last link is on one hand it is written Quote:
Apparently the "error" there was not putting "Exercise" in front of "Green Dagger" Potato-Potatoe This all points out that no matter who writes about an event there WILL be a spin put on it either by the writer or the Editor and the last article was written by someone who "retired from the Marine Corps as a colonel in 2019" .... so no inherent bias there.....:re: No matter what you read or hear there will always be two ( or more ) sides to the story. Finally a quote from the last article (* I added the bold) Quote:
|
Re: Trounced on home turf ?
Very cool. Thank you for the info. Now off to read the articles. Might be fodder for some cool scenarios in this stuff.
|
Re: Trounced on home turf ?
If actual force composition could be found and where on Twentynine palms it took place in it could be interesting but methinks from the hints that have been dropped that elements of 40 Commando infiltrated to the rear and found their OPFOR HQ which is always a game-winner and a big embarrassment for that side of the exercise.
It would really suck to be the Captain in charge of that HQ's security..... ( really, really suck) When a retired USMC Col. admits the other guys were "an exceptionally capable unit"...... they were. (with plenty of experience in ops like that ) |
Re: Trounced on home turf ?
For what it's worth, I wish to point out there are no winners or losers in an exercise. How you train and the lessons you take away from that, will determine who the winners or losers are on the only place it matters, the battlefield. That's what we call "warfighting".
The ref. below will provide and hopefully fill in some holes from the refs already submitted. You won't get much about equipment, though you'll know who played and at what strength and mission. This was not a normal run of the mill exercise; it was also a test in unit reorganization (Up & Down) for both the UK and USMC. For the USMC that means Plan 2030. For the UK, "Future Commando Force" (Program-Mine) and pre-deployment training under a new unit concept called Littoral Response Group (LRG) (South) to be tested in the Sinai next year. And of course, how do these units work along the lines of "interoperability" or are we on the right track at this time. "...40 Commando has the lead in creating LRG South, “which we’ve brought together here for the first time” along with sub-units including armored support and commando logistics." https://news.usni.org/2021/12/06/u-s...ifornia-desert In the USN putting the "mission" before the word exercise, i.e., LANTSUBASWEX '87 (Atlantic Submarine Anti-Submarine Warfare Exercise.) There was a real-world psychological benefit to doing this in case the Soviets showed up "uninvited". The Cold War, ah, those were the days!?! ;) Regards, Pat :capt: |
Re: Trounced on home turf ?
There are only "winners" in the red-top press mis-reporting something they half-understand picked up in some bar gossip.
The exercise will have demonstrated to those running it what tactics and techniques actually worked, and those that did not do so well. Exercises are a learning experience (if they arent the sort of scripted things where the result is pre-determined of course, but even those teach lessons in e.g. logistics if say those fall over running the pre-scripted master plan). But the gutter press need "emotive" headlines to sell thier rag so "Ruritanian Airforce beats USAF, shlock horror!" in the Daily Fail. Meanwhile some specialist publication runs something more reasonable about how the Ruritanians did OK and won 3 out of 6 2 on 2 visual rules close in dogfights when visiting on a training mission but lost 5 out of 6 BVR scraps as their mig-21s were totally outclassed in that field with no long range missiles or radar. Basically - dont get your news from the tabloids:)! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.