February 23rd, 2004, 07:41 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Are you tough enough to be the "King of the Hill"?
Quote:
Originally posted by DavidG:
quote:
Originally posted by Slynky:
However, when I perceive their is a balance problem in the map, I think my time would be spent better doing other things instead of trying to overcome (what appears to be) an insurmountable problem.
|
Try this and see how much fun it is when you win. 
Quite true. No disagreement. But, I think, the results will be 1 of 2 things: (1) You win and then think it's because the opponent was just a weak player (therefore, the victory is a bit diminished) or (2) You lose and feel it's due to the map and wish you had spent the time doing something else.
NOW, if I played on a map that held benefits for one person while harming MY game/position and I won that game and it was Asmala, I'd probably get so swell-headed NO one could stand me...  .
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|