[Some1]

But the most important argument is that Israel had nukes for the Last 30 years, and have never used them.

Only 1 country has used them (Russia and china, how "evil" we thought they were never even did), anyway agree a little with you, but i think without them they would be "fine" to, the first 20 years were a lot more hostile and they survived. When a country has them, it makes them "the Law" because who would dare to oppose them? But i think i make this OT topic even more OT.

For example, Indonesia could build them if they wanted to. Australia could easily do it, in fact our chief scientist during the 60s was a huge supporter of chemical, bioligical and nuclear weapons (none of which were -ve words back then). We even starting building a reactor capable of making weapons grade fissile material, but after the foundation was layed it was abandonded because of lack of support in the domestic politics of the day (change of government).

Yep, but i think that the USA would be very angry when Indonesia would get them. And when australia get them, they would not even mind it. Not that indonesia would use them, its just:" You are our friend, you can research them, you ain't, stop or we'll.....".

Is it not a public Iraqi policy to give money to the families of suicide bombers in Israel? Sounds like a ties to me.

As i said, USA supports terrorists too. So are we morally superiour that our "terrorists" are good and they are bad??... Our terrorists kill a lot of people to, but they just won't get they 8 o'clock news and their terrorists do.

Its in the eye of the beholder, to one they are "freedom-fighters" to the other they are terrorists.

R.