
April 2nd, 2003, 10:54 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
Originally posted by rextorres:
quote: Originally posted by Sinapus:
The logistical train is catching up with the forward group. That's why they paused a few days ago.
It's not simply a matter of driving through a sector with a resupply depot, after all. (Or even fleeting 'tanker' ships with other ships.)
|
So your saying that they planned for the tanks to be 50 miles from Bagdad short on fuel and for the soldiers to get caught short on rations!?
You've never studied logistics, or spoken with someone familiar with the subject, right?
Shortages are indeed expected. Same with maintenance failures on armored vehicles.
Quote:
I'm not a logistical expert no, but it doesn't take a military genius to figure out that it was not intended that way and that it's not a good thing. We won't know why until it's all over, but my guess is the "unwargamed" militia is what has caused all the supply problems.
|
It seems to take an armchair general, sitting in front of a computer thousands of kilometers away from the front, who has an axe to grind to come to conclusions based on ignorance and what you think it should be like.
Even if the "unwargamed" militia hadn't shown up, they'd still have to pause periodically so the trucks carrying fuel, beans and ammunition could catch up. (Not to mention let the troops get some sleep.) Which, of course, would lead you to presume incompetence in the planners, right?
Btw, there's a wide gulf between "this was not in the plan" and ["WE'RE DOOMED, MAN! QUAGMIRED, MAN! SUPPLY LINE CUT, MAN!" "STAY CALM MOMMY, I MEAN, SQUAT!"]
[ April 02, 2003, 23:12: Message edited by: Sinapus ]
__________________
--
...can you and your associates arrange that for me, Mr. Morden?
|