[quote]Originally posted by geoschmo:
Quote:
|
What I don't understand is why you insist that not only was there no threat, but that we must know there was no threat and therefore our reasons for war must be something else other than what we claim they are.
|
How many Gas or Anthrax is needed to kill a good number of people? How spread it into the US cities?
Everybody knew that Saddam had not balistic missiles, then, how?
These in my view, are basic questions that need to be answered to consider if Saddam was really a potential treat to USA or not.
Yes, with time, he could have purchased the technology (even purchase Nukes) but he had 12 years to do it and he was unable to.
But then, I want to know why Saddam's WMD was a more imminent threat that North Korea's active program. In fact, NK claims to have already Nukes and to have missiles that could reach every place in USA.
Honestly, think this war like most the wars, was about power.
And honestly again, don't think after this war USA will be a more safe place to live, because as proved the fuc$%&g attack against the WTC, a maniac doesn't need WMD to kill massive number of people.