View Single Post
  #5  
Old March 7th, 2003, 11:37 PM
gregebowman's Avatar

gregebowman gregebowman is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: tampa, fl
Posts: 1,511
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
gregebowman is on a distinguished road
Default Re: (OT) Games That Have Dissapointed You

Quote:
Originally posted by Pax:
quote:
Originally posted by gregebowman:
quote:
Originally posted by Pax:
What I've been grossly disappointed by:

Civ3 especially the slimeball tactic of their expansion pack!!

All I want to know is if you just want to play Civ 3: Play the World in solo mode, is it worth the price to get the new tribes and the couple of new stuff they included? I heard it's not good for multi-play, which doesn't make sense, since it was advertised for multi-players. But since I don't do multi-play, I just need to know about the solo play mode.
I wouldn't know. It won't even run on my frikkin' computer!!!

Who in the Nine Hells ever heard of an Xpac that WON'T run on all the O/S's of the BASE program ... ?!? Civ3 (base) will run on Win95 ... WTH won't the xpac ... ?!?

And, yes, I'd be getting it FOR the multiplay. That's where most games' longevity is ... playing against other human beings.

I know. I was so disappointed when I saw the hardware requirements for that expansion. Heck, that's more than most new games coming out. If you're going to require all that, then make Civ 4. Not require all of that stuff for a "xpac". I've never heard of that either.
Reply With Quote