Oh, the aforementioned tests were not that long to do, the longest part was the writing of the Posts.
(And the correction of my mistakes that is)
Hmm as it is +12 (and not +16 as I thought, don't ask me why), you will need 10 years instead of 8 years to go from Deadly to Harsh. Not too bad.
And 24 years to go from the lowest value (Deadly 0.0/0.1) to the highest (Optimal 1.5), while 24 years were just enough to go from Deadly to Harsh with a +5 facility.
Well, for your new proposal, +48 means you could go from Deadly to Optimal in no more than seven years, if you consider all the facilities are built the same year. If you add such facilities, then you should indeed leave the -10 event.
(It also means 4 or 5 years depending on the value to go from Harsh to Optimal)
*Stops playing with figures and resumes his game of AIC no-warp instead*
(Edited because of a mistake with numbers, I forgot a year each time.
)
[ September 20, 2003, 15:55: Message edited by: Alneyan ]