[Andrés]

Baron, I was looking for the supposed scientific evidence, not complains about censorship in a yellow-press pseudo-scientific page.

Most of what I see there is what I said, complains about censorship, about a work called "Shattering the Myths of Darwinism". They seem to trying to sell me a book but looking at the contents page is enogh.

Those complains don't sound realistic at all. It's curious that it only quotes single words and short phrases and not longer complains.
What people were most likely complaining about was about deceiving people disguising those lies as true science.
And I really can't believe that no one actually refuted at least the most outright lies in that work.

Most of the points are repetitions of the same wrong arguments creationists have been using for decades, not something new (even if the authors claims not to be a creationist) and it looks that the only intention is to sell me a book.

The link I had posted about Evolution Vs. Creationisms is still valid conters most of those points with serious scientific yet easy to understand explanations.

The only new evidence that appears to be new genetic analisys that prove that some species are not so genetically similar as they were thought to be.
I'll have to investigate but I suspect that we're talking about a few exeptions that don't alter the big picture.