[Krsqk]

since you're obviously not reading the pages we link to.

I assume, since you've been posting links to talkorigins, that you have some idea of the vastness of the site. Be patient. I'm assuming that you actually wanted me to read the links, not just shift-click them so they'd change color on my screen.

Pure creationism has no valid evidence at all. Evolution has some valid evidence.

Pure creationism would not leave evidence of origins. There's not going to be a big digital clock stuck in the ground somewhere that says, "6184 years, 2 months, 3 days, 13 hours, and 28 minutes since creation." Or, "God was here." Creation doesn't purport to be scientifically provable (I get this odd feeling of deja vu every time I say that). It does claim that all the evidence we see is a result of post-creation activities. Is there any way to falsify that? No, since there's no way to scientifically falsify creation. Don't acknowledge creation is unproveable with one breath and demand proof for it in the next. Whether or not creation is true, there will never be any "evidence" for it.