Okay, so I'm redefining immoral without saying so.
Perhaps I should just say that attempting to regulate human behavior would be to deny pre-determined human behavior...except that then said denial would be pre-determined behavior.
I don't see how one can have both the legitimate rule of law and predeterminism.
I guess it would be like taking agnosticism one step further: "Nothing can ever be known...including what 'nothing' means."
__________________
The Unpronounceable Krsqk
"Well, sir, at the moment my left processor doesn't know what my right is doing." -
Freefall