[narf poit chez BOOM]

My arguments have had far fewer holes in them than those arguing for an anti-clock, actually. [Wink]

Your point about something useless being the opposite of something useful does not mean that all useful things actually have something that is the opposite of them. In fact, almost none of them do. Only a very small range of objects/ideas/concepts actually have an opposite. You have yet to prove that there is anything that could be the opposite of a clock (even with a narrower definition of what a clock is).

that was your Last post on the clock.

it's an anti-matter device that never lets any clock run and always gives incorrect time.
unless you want the oposite of a single clock, in which case it only has to never let that clock run.
and for most of this, theoretical is as good as were gonna get.

and that's my Last post on the clock and i think i met all the requirements.

[ April 18, 2003, 22:11: Message edited by: narf poit chez BOOM ]