Thread
:
My AI Design Q&A
View Single Post
#
12
June 12th, 2003, 04:47 AM
JLS
Lieutenant Colonel
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: RI. USA
Posts: 1,470
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: My AI Design Q&A
Bump
Quote:
Originally posted by cybersol:
The AI minesweeping is defenitely not optimal, but it is somewhat sufficient. Case in point, A pair of AI's facing off don't remain sealed off from each other forever. The way the AI uses the "mine sweeper" class ship, think of it as a lone kamikaze ship aimed at the nearest marked mine field. Not ideal, but it works with enough of them. Add additional minesweepers (in place of boarding or kamikaze) that will join fleets and the result appears adequate, though far from optimal.
I use true for ships don't move through minefields
What if, the AI Player (1) had minefield that was marked belonging to Player (2) from first contact. Player (2) is 3 Systems away and a treaty is signed between the (1) and (2). Before AI Player (1) cleared Players (2) Minefield that is 3 Systems away from AI (1)players HW.
Now AI Player (1) makes first contact with Player (3) Minefield; about 15 turns after AI Players (1) agreement with Player (2), 6 Systems away from Players (1) Home World. AI player (1) and (3) almost immediately have hostilities.
With this scenario how do you think, AI player (1) will use his Mine Sweepers...
Please, no whos on first
[ June 15, 2003, 19:28: Message edited by: JLS ]
__________________
>~~~~~~AI CAMPAIGN
-NEW-v4.191a AIC
~~~~~~<
Optimized for[i] Solitaire Play!
With or without all Warp points, Finite resources, same starts and Simultaneous movement
~~~ CLICK ON >>>
(((>
<font color="green"> AI CAMPAIGN v4.191
</font> <
))
<<< To Get ~~~
JLS
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JLS
Visit JLS's homepage!
Find all posts by JLS