
June 23rd, 2003, 05:29 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4, MOO3, and HOMM4
Quote:
Sure it is - he was responding to Atrocities asking specifically for positive opinions (and he gave one), while you were criticising a workaround for a bug someone was complaining about.
=0=
Besides, you were saying outright that his solution was a bad one, offering no solution of your own, when he was trying to be helpful (to someone else, no less). How is that not picking on him?
|
*bold portion inserted*
As stated previously, my post was a criticism of MOO3 and QS, not of Eddie or the workaround. It was a criticism of such a workaround being necessary, which is not at all a criticism of Eddie or picking on him, which is what started this whole line of argument.
=0=
Quote:
I do belive this is the first time I have seen you directly admit a mistake - even as weak an admittal as it was.
|
Obviously you have not read very many of my Posts, as I always admit I have made mistakes when I make them. Differences of opinion on subjective issues do not constitute mistakes (which is supported by things you have said previously in this thread, btw ).
=0=
Ack! So... are you my clone, or am I your clone? Hmm... I am going to go with the former, as I registered over 1 year before you did. Pulling seniority on ya! Muahahahahah! 
|