Re: SE4 Rating System
If I understand it correctly, there are 2 players who wish to be rated in Anklebiters:
Loser (who, if I understand it, thought everyone had to agree for it to be a rated game and therefore, assumed it wasn't a rated one)
RexTorres (who assumed he was being rated)
I have no record of a request by either of these 2 to be rated in Anklebiters except for the recent Posts in the Anklebiters thread.
As is the case with games that have already started, allowing players to be rated after the game has started requires an "OK" from all the existing players who are being rated. There are several reasons a person may not want another person to be allowed to have a game rated after the game has progressed as far as this one has. I don't need a reason when you send me your "vote", I just need to know if you think it's OK or NOT OK. I need a vote from everyone who is participating as a rated player.
I will allow a week for the responses for each of the players to come in to me in email. After that, if every rated player has responded AND every rated player says it is OK, I will add either Loser or RexTorres (or both) to the site.
In closing, I would like to remind the players that I post to this thread as a notice that I have made changes to the Ratings site. That means, usually, I have added a game or completed a game. Everyone who thinks they have some kind of activity in the Ratings should check the site to verify information about them has been modified (and modified correctly) when they see such a notice here.
Thank you for your cooperation.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|