Thread: Belly sin...
View Single Post
  #16  
Old September 12th, 2003, 10:03 AM
dogscoff's Avatar

dogscoff dogscoff is offline
General
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dogscoff is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Belly sin...

Quote:
How did you come to be reading this? I had no impression that you were the religious sort...
I'm not, I just find the website hysterically funny. I'm only just coming round to the idea that it's not an eloborate hoax. You should read their review of the South Park film ('Straight from hell'), it's brilliant. I wouldn't be surprised if the makers of the film had a copy of that review framed somewhere.
Another good one is "Mary Poppins" where dear old Mary is criticised for practising the Black Arts.

I was first introduced to capalert by a fantastic website called www.ntk.net, which i read every week. Among other things, ntk reviews all the latest films by simply quoting from other film review sites, including www.imdb.com (internet movie database) www.cndb.com (celebrity nude database) capalert, the bbfc (british board film classification) and various others. The ironic bit is that while capalert may review a film as follows:
"Three seconds of gratuitous cleavage exposure. Disgusting!"
the cndb (for example) would say:
"Three seconds of gratuitous cleavage exposure. Cool!"

The "unmarried pregnancy" explanation sounds convincing. Thanks. I'm kind of disappointed that it turns out to be a sin I couldn't ever commit myself (I have a collection) but at least my curiosity has been satisfied and my vocabulary enhanced.

EDIT: Just been back to check but it looks like both the south park and mary poppins reviews have been toned down.

[ September 12, 2003, 09:17: Message edited by: dogscoff ]
Reply With Quote