Enterprise wrecked any consistency with anything in other ST series. It is a good thing they dropped the Star Trek from its title...
TNG had a number of inconsistencies as well... though it was often far more silly than necessary... a kid as a bridge crewman? Yeah... sure...
Quote:
|
A count was kept of the crew members seen on the show, and after seven years that count was over 200 while the ship only had a crew of something like 135.
|
As I said before, that is just being anally retentive. Who the hell cares that they used different extras? It doesn't matter. It would have been much more expensive to keep the same extras throughout the entire 7 year run. Actual named crewmen don't come close to 135.
Quote:
|
The ship looked as new as the day it was crissoned despite not having resources to reapir hull damage.
|
They found plenty of resources. Anything on the hull plating could be replicated from any source matter, including intermittent dust particiles in space. All it takes is some time and energy. When they were in extended periods of fighting and had no time to replicate and repair, the ship accrued plenty of battle damage.
Quote:
|
The Shuttles craft count. They blew up quite a few. (This was eventually touched on in one episode where they mentioned they were building replacements.) Good catch.
|
I think that was mentioned fairly early on...
Quote:
|
The fact that they had replactor rationing when they could eat all the food they wanted in the Holo-suites.
|
Food in the holo suites is holographic, and could not be eaten to gain nutrients. If it were made to actually be editable and digestible, it would require the use of replicators, and would use up some of the crewman's replicator rations. There is no inconsistency there at all.
[ January 05, 2004, 06:53: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]