[geoschmo]

Originally posted by Loser:
Additionally, he mentions 'New Energy' in a positive light. Being heavy on physics myself I've read up on this 'New Energy' and it's a bunch of bunk (I know some of you disagree, feel free to "Bring it!"). He's only mentioning this in such a light so that he can appear sympathetic to the fringers that are his target audience anyway. To me, this draws strongly away from his credibility.

This was also for me the weakest point in his arguments. However, my own little irrational voice pointed out, "So he's a kook, but that doesn't mean he's wrong about the other stuff."

Anybody know where I can get a ten year supply of emergency rations.