How come is it that anytime there is a debate with Fyron involved it degenerates to a debate of semantics.
The only person that made an unequivical statement was Fyron. (I'll repeat what he wrote for effect)
Quote:
|
we just did not cause the hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica. That was caused by massive volcanic eruptions.
|
What Fyron wrote seems unambiguous (even taken in the context that it was written) - at least to me.
Even Fyron's links don't make the assertions that Volcanoes cause the hole in ozone layer. All they suggest is that Volcanoes made the hole worse not that they were the cause of the hole.
If Fyron wants we can continue to argue the meaning of words, the sources of links, the politics of the posters or the appropriateness of the Posts. It certainly won't be a debate about Ozone depletion.
[ February 13, 2004, 21:56: Message edited by: rextorres ]