[Fyron]

Originally posted by klausD:
I dont think that a lot of SE3 players has abandoned the series after SE4 release. The most players had complaints about some good SE3 game mechanics which changed in SE4, but nonetheless played it like hell.

You obviously did not know the people I knew then.

I cannot believe that it is easy for a normal user to construct 3D shipsets.

Actually... SE4 requires creating 3D shipsets now, otherwie they look like crap in-game. SE5 will simply require either using a different 3D graphics tool, or a converter.

Also I am VERY sceptical about the real time tactical combat engine. This is a big change to the classical SE approach to this matter.

Yes, but a good change.

Many traditional turn based gamers will leave the fanbase because of this. (maybe me included)

If they leave simply because it is announced to be real time, then they are not true strategy fans. They (and you) will have to try it out, and I have every confidence that it will be nothing like what you are expecting (especially after previous conversations with you on this subject). Real time can very easily play just like SE4 combat does now, with very simple pausing features, and the ability to issue orders while paused. Well, it will not be exactly the same, as it will eliminate all of the idiosyncrocies inherent in EVERY turn based combat system imagineable. It will be better.

And because of a lot of newcomers which are attracted by realtime games the whole structure of the SE-fanbase will change.

Only if it is made to be Starcraft-like real time. Otherwise, no.

For us all I hope that MM has learned something about the MOO3 desaster.

Of course. Do not presume that MM will pull off another MOO3. MOO3 combat was not bad because it was real time, it was bas because it was done very, very poorly.