March 24th, 2004, 04:04 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Longest game?
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
I was thinking more with ships, but even for troops 50% is a big bonus to add to what else you can have...
|
Actually, it is not. Think about Iraq war. USA had superior equipments and superior training compared to Iraq soldiers. IIRC it was about 100-200 USA soldiers lost their lives during the campaign, but there were tens of thousands of Iraq soldiers who died (again, IIRC). Why? Because US troops could use satellites and reconnaissance planes to locate Iraq forces and bash them before they even knew something was wrong. Also tanks you use (M1A2 Abrams, IIRC) has far greater range than Iraq tanks ever had not to mention targetting system, which allowed US tanks to shoot with out problems in the middle of sandstorm. Iraq tanks relied heavily on visual sight.
Had US army have same equipments than Iraq soldiers, the result of war could have been something very different. I believe that even several hundred percents of improvement in troops and ships capability due training and superior equipments is not only credible but grounded.
__________________
If you give a man a fish, he will eat a day;
But if you teach a man to fish, he will buy an ugly hat;
And if you talk about a fish to a starving man, then you're a consultant
|