View Single Post
  #4  
Old April 5th, 2004, 06:44 AM
Ruatha's Avatar

Ruatha Ruatha is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Linghem, Östergötland, Sweden
Posts: 2,255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ruatha is on a distinguished road
Default Re: New PBW game: Fast and furious

Quote:
Originally posted by Slynky:
Sounds, interesting, Ruatha. Not sure I'd be interested...well, I am, but I don't do too well in multi-player games.

But, it seems I have a mouth, so I'll comment on the idea :

Full-tech, part-tech, or no starting tech?
Racial points?

Would email between people be allowed or just in-game? If email allowed, then adequate turn cycle would need to be considered.

Given my experience with so-called "fast" games, it just ain't so with too many players. May I suggest the limit be 10 players? More suitable, 8, I think. (I am just remembering the horrible turnaround problem in the Experiment game)

Consider no attacks till, say, 5 turns have passed.

And, although this changes the qame (quite) a bit, if 8 players, then 1 warp point out to ONE system at a single homeworld of each player. Of course, since it appears to be a map one would make, it wouldn't be too hard to add these systems and make them balanced.

Just some thoughts to help get it rolling . ( don't mean to "tread" on your idea)
I'd guess 2000 points, low tech start, hight cost.
A battle fo escorts.
No limit on starting attacks (emergency build anyone??)
Should you research anything? DUCS? or Frigates?
Racial points propably spent on Agr/Def and construction I'd guess.
Race design will be vital!
As there'll be no large empires turn time could be limited to 30 hours (disregarding my standard 48 hours turn times in my hosted games)

And I do hope there'll be few players as that'd make the mapmaking easier

Spoon, You're welcome, the game is up at PBW as "Fast and Furious"

[ April 05, 2004, 05:50: Message edited by: Ruatha ]
Reply With Quote