[Atrocities]

Any who has worn a costum like that knows that you cannot feel crap through the gloves so there was no way he was intentionally "rubbing" their breasts. (Objectively speaking of course, if he did then throw the book at the punk.)

Besides if he was wouldn't they have said something sooner? What most likely happened is they developed the pictures and saw that they could "Claim" that he touched them in the breasts because a photograph gave the appearence of so and figured they could CASH IN on it. "A picutre is worth a thousand words." True, but a picture is subjective and can be taken many ways. Pictures should never be considered evidence of wrong doing without supportive PROOF. The testemony of two women, obviousy seeking money, is NOT proof.

These others are just copy cats and should all be charged with filing false police reports.

No the two women who charged this guy with a crime, thus ruining his life forever, are the real criminals. They are doing it for one reason, MONEY.

[ April 11, 2004, 18:33: Message edited by: Atrocities ]